Revisiting the Secretary Problem under Noisy Evaluation: Robustness and Performance Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/gmbw9f27Keywords:
Secretary Problem, Optimal Stopping, Noisy Observations, Sequential Decision-Making, Monte Carlo SimulationAbstract
This paper investigates how the existence of different degrees of noise in the real world affects the final results of the classic secretarial problem by constructing a noise inclusive secretarial strategy model. Rather than assuming that decision-makers know the precise rankings of all candidates, this study has set up a situation where the observed rankings of each candidate by the decisionmaker are subject to noise and, as a result, deviate from the optimal probability-maximizing outcome of the classical secretarial problem. To study the effect of this uncertainty, the noisy secretarial strategy model also uses Monte Carlo simulation. A set of indices for the new model environment also includes the success rate, average selection rank and regret value. Based on the above results, a relatively small amount of noise will still significantly reduce the final decision. With an increase in initial noise, the proportion of the selected best candidate decreases significantly. Based on the above study, the strength of the classic secretarial problem is highly sensitive to the initial observations. Although this strategy has almost the same success rate in a low-noise environment, it is still not feasible for realworld application.
References
Science, 2024, 70(3): 1582-1598. secretary problems, and online mechanisms. Microsoft Research, [2] PEREZ-SALAZAR S, SINGH M, TORIELLO A. Robust 2007, 434–443. Online Selection with Uncertain Offer Acceptance. Mathematics [7] HARB E. Fishing For Better Constants: The Prophet
of Operations Research, 2025, 50(3): 2226-2260. Secretary Via Poissonization[EB/OL]. (2023-03-01). https:// [3] Aaditya Ramdas, Peter Grünwald, Vladimir Vovk, et al. arxiv.org/abs/2303.00605. Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inference. [8] CORREA J, CRISTI A, DÜTTING P, et al. Fairness and Bias
Statistical Science, 2023, 38(4): 576-601. in Online Selection. Operations Research, 2025. DOI:10.1287/ [4] Salem, J., & Gupta, S. Secretary Problems with Biased opre.2021.0662. Evaluations Using Partial Ordinal Information. Management [9] Gnedin A. Best choice from the planar Poisson process.
Science, 2024, 70(8), 5337–5366. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 2024, 111, 317–354. [5] FUJII K, YOSHIDA Y. Secretary problem of predictions and [10] SALEM J, GUPTA S. Secretary Problems with Biased an order of choice. International Journal of Geometric Methods Evaluations Using Partial Ordinal Information[J]. Management
in Modern Physics 2024, 21: 05. Science, 2024, 70(8): 5337-5366. [6] Babaioff, M., Immorlica, N., & Kleinberg, R. Matroids,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
