Research on the legitimacy of the entity of administrative act -- Based on Ali Group’s anti-monopoly sky-high administrative penalty case

Authors

  • Xun Zhao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/2wjerc44

Keywords:

legitimacy of the entity of administrative act, proportionality principle, anti-monopoly, discretion in administrative acts

Abstract

The topic of this paper is the legality of the Alibaba penalty case. Research methodology of the article is using the general standards of legality of administrative behavior, the application of the principle of separation of powers, whether the violation of the basic provisions, the protection of the principle of reliance and the prohibition of abuse of power, so as to achieve the effect of reviewing the legality of the discussion of the four major perspectives. In this case, the judgment results of the fine link, does not satisfy the proportionality principle of proportionality between the means and the end and the proportionality principle of the discretionary system, it is Based on the judgment, the legality of the administrative penalty imposed by the General Administration of Market Supervision on Ali Group’s monopolistic behavior is still open to question.

References

[1] State Administration for Market Supervision and Administration, Decision on Administrative Penalties, State Market Supervision [2021] No. 28

[2] State Council Institutional Reform Program, issued by the State Council on March 13, 2018

[3] Provisions on the Functional Configuration, Internal Organization and Staffing of the State Administration for Market Supervision and Administration, "(a) Responsible for comprehensive market supervision and administration.

[4] Responsible for unified anti-monopoly enforcement. (v) Responsible for supervision and management of market order."

[5] Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China, Chapter VI Investigation of Suspected Monopoly Behavior.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-19