Analysis of the Dynamic Co-movement Mechanism Between Cryptocurrencies and Traditional Assets

Authors

  • Yansong Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/b5jcq871

Keywords:

Cryptocurrency, safe-haven asset, geopolitical risk, inflation expectation

Abstract

This paper selects the data of Bitcoin, Gold, and the S&P 500 index from 2018 to 2025, utilizing GARCH(1,1) and DCC-GARCH models to depict the dynamic conditional correlations among assets. By incorporating the Global Geopolitical Risk Index, the 10-year breakeven inflation rate, and the VIX panic index, it constructs daily and monthly cross-frequency regression models to examine their macro-driving mechanisms. The results show that whether at the high-frequency daily level or the smoothed monthly level, macroeconomic variables exhibit extremely significant driving effects on the co-movement of Bitcoin. Under the liquidity squeeze concerns triggered by intensified global panic or high inflation expectations, Bitcoin fails to act as a haven alongside gold. Instead, it exhibits a stronger synchronous crash with the US stock market. This empirical study rejects the hypothesis of Bitcoin as "digital gold," revealing its essence as a "risk amplifier" highly dependent on traditional liquidity, and provides quantitative support for international investors in asset allocation under extreme macroeconomic scenarios.

References

[1] Ustaoglu E. Diversification, hedge, and safe-haven properties of gold and bitcoin with portfolio implications during the Russia–Ukraine war. Resources Policy, 2023, 82: 103569.

[2] Singh S, Bansal P, & Bhardwaj N. Correlation between Geopolitical Risk, Economic Policy Uncertainty, and Bitcoin Using Partial and Multiple Wavelet Coherence. Research in International Business and Finance, 2022, 63: 101756.

[3] Klein T, Thu H P, & Walther T. Bitcoin is not the New Gold–A comparison of volatility, correlation, and portfolio performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2018, 59: 105-116.

[4] Conlon T, Corbet S, & McGee R J. Inflation and cryptocurrencies revisited: A time-scale analysis. Economics Letters, 2023, 206: 109996.

[5] Choi S, & Shin J. Bitcoin: An inflation hedge but not a safe haven. Finance Research Letters, 2022, 46: 102379.

[6] Corbet S, Hou Y G, Hu Y, Larkin C, Lucey B, & Oxley L. Cryptocurrency liquidity and volatility interrelationships during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 2022, 45: 102137.

[7] Caldara D, & Iacoviello M. Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 2022, 112(4): 1194-1225.

[8] Corbet S, Lucey B, Urquhart A, & Yarovaya L. Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2019, 62: 182-199.

[9] Bouri E, Molnár P, Azzi G, Roubaud D, & Hagfors L I. On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier? Finance Research Letters, 2017, 20: 192-198.

[10] Engle R. Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2002, 20(3): 339-350.

[11] Katsiampa P. Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models. Economics Letters, 2017, 158: 3-6.

[12] Engle R F, Ghysels E, & Sohn B. On the economic sources of stock market volatility. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95(2): 349-362.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-13