Evolution of Statistical Methods in Financial Time Series Analysis: An Empirical Analysis from ARIMA to the GARCH Family of Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/nb0cdd93Keywords:
Financial time series analysis, ARIMA model, GARCH model, evolution of statistical methodsAbstract
Financial time series analysis is one of the key tools for asset pricing and forecasting, and its statistical methods have been continuously developing according to market demand. In the early days, the ARIMA model had great advantages in macro data analysis through its assumptions of linearity, homoscedasticity, and stationarity. Its stationary linear model was often used to predict shortterm economic indicators. However, as market products gradually emerged, non-linear and highly volatile data gradually dominated the trading market, indicating that the ARIMA model was unable to characterize non-linear characteristics such as volatility clustering, asymmetric leverage effects, spike tails, and long memory, which became increasingly apparent. Therefore, the academic community has successively introduced models based on nonlinear assumptions such as ARCH, GARCH family models, EGARCH, TGARCH, and FIGARCH, which have achieved accurate prediction of financial market risks. This article conducts a literature review and comparative analysis to study the evolution, improvement, and application of ARIMA models from traditional ARIMA models to GARCH family models. It explores the advantages and limitations of ARIMA model in modeling financial time series analysis statistics, and GARCH improves the modeling framework. It summarizes the impact of its development on financial time series analysis and provides a selection of modeling methods for financial analysis.
References
used in low-volatility indicators such as GDP and infla- Econometrica, 1982, 50(4): 987-1007. Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6130 [2] Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional [11] Misha D. An Analysis of the Predictive Ability of ARIMA-
heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, 31(3): 307- GARCH Models on the S&P 500 Index During Crisis Periods. 327. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Financial [3] Hamilton J D. Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Econometrics. Atlantis Press, 2025: 1046-1053.
Press, 1994. [12] Andersen T G, & Bollerslev T. Answering the skeptics: [4] Ljung, G. M., & Box, G. E. P. . On a measure of lack of fit in Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts.
time series models. Biometrika, 1978, 65(2): 297–303. International Economic Review, 1998, 39(4): 885-905. [5] Bollerslev T, Engle R F, & Nelson D B. ARCH models. [13] Nwosu C O. A HYBRID APPROACH TO FORECASTING
Handbook of Econometrics, 1994, 4: 2959-3038. STOCK INDICES USING THE ARMA–GARCH AND [6] Zakoian J M. Threshold heteroskedastic models. Journal of ARMA–EGARCH MODELS: Evidence from the Nigerian Stock
Economic Dynamics and Control, 1994, 18(5): 931-955. Exchange. Lagos Journal of Management and Administration, [7] Bollerslev T, & Mikkelsen H O. Fractionally Integrated 2025, 3(1): 1-22. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. [ 1 4 ] K a u r P. A C o m p a r a t i v e M o d e l l i n g o f E s s e n t i a l
Journal of Econometrics, 1996, 74(1): 3-30. Characteristics of Volatility. Journal of Applied Financial [8] Ahmar A S. Novel time series methods in economic Econometrics, 2025, 7(1): 33-47. forecasting: SutteARIMA evidence from Indonesian Consumer [15] Li M. A study of financial time series volatility forecasting
Price Index. Journal of Applied Statistics, 2025, 52(14): 2789- method based on GARCH modeling. In ACM 2024 International 2806. Conference on Big Data Finance. ACM Press, 2024: 112-118. [9] Nwosu C O, & Okonkwo S I. Comparative Analysis of [16] Mokoena T, & van der Merwe L. A Fusion of Statistical and stochastic process in forecasting key macroeconomic variables Machine Learning Methods: GARCH-XGBoost for Improved in Nigeria. Lagos Journal of Management and Administration, Volatility Modelling of the JSE Top40 Index. Mathematics, 2025, 3(2): 31-47. 2025, 13(3): 155. [10] Ho S T, & Lee J H. ARIMA vs. Machine Learning in [17] Okafor I. Developing the Hybrid ARIMA-FIGARCH Portfolio Return Forecasting: A Comparative Study Integrating Model for Time Series Analysis. International Journal of
GARCH-Based Volatility Estimation. In Proceedings of the 15th Financial Econometrics, 2025, 8(2): 56-71. International Conference on Economics, Finance and Statistics.
Scitepress, 2025: 412-419.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
