Should we fear a cashless society?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/pa4ftj39Keywords:
Cashless society, Digital payment, CBDC, Market power, Network effectsAbstract
The rapid development of digital payment technologies has accelerated the global transition toward cashless societies, raising important questions regarding financial efficiency, market competition, and strategic risk. While cashless payment systems can reduce transaction costs, improve payment efficiency, and promote financial innovation, they may also generate concerns related to market concentration, privacy protection, financial inclusion, and systemic vulnerability. This paper aims to examine whether a cashless society should be regarded as a source of economic progress or a potential threat to social welfare. This study adopts a qualitative analytical approach by integrating theories from industrial organization, digital finance, and welfare economics. It evaluates the economic benefits and potential risks of cashless payment systems through comparative analysis of digital payment platforms, network effects, market structure, and the emerging role of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Relevant theoretical literature and international case studies are used to support the discussion. The findings suggest that the welfare consequences of a cashless society depend less on the disappearance of cash itself than on the institutional and competitive environment in which digital payment systems operate. Excessive market concentration resulting from network effects may weaken competition, reduce consumer welfare, and increase strategic risks. Conversely, effective competition policies, data governance, and well-designed CBDCs can mitigate these challenges while preserving the efficiency gains of digital payments. This paper contributes to the literature by providing an integrated framework linking digital finance, market competition, and strategic risk. It further offers policy recommendations aimed at balancing technological innovation, financial inclusion, and market regulation, thereby supporting the sustainable development of future digital payment ecosystems.
References
cashless society is not the disappearance of physical cash [2] Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A itself, but the concentration of economic and information- strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Press.
al power that may emerge within digital payment ecosys- [3] Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. In tems. While cashless payment systems can significantly Social theory re-wired (pp. 203-213). Routledge.
reduce transaction costs, improve efficiency, and promote [4] Rogoff, K. (2017). The curse of cash: How largefinancial innovation, they may also generate substantial denomination bills aid crime and tax evasion and constrain risks associated with market concentration, data privacy, monetary policy. Princeton University Press.
financial exclusion, and systemic dependence on a small [5] Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. MIT number of dominant platforms. press.
Drawing upon theories of network effects, platform [6] Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition competition, and social welfare analysis, this study in two-sided markets. Journal of the european economic demonstrates that the overall impact of a cashless soci- association, 1(4), 990-1029. ety depends largely on the institutional environment in [7] DIGIT, T. I. A. OECD Skills Outlook 2019.
which digital payments operate. In highly competitive and [8] Rogoff, K. (2017). The curse of cash: How largewell-regulated markets, digital payment systems can en- denomination bills aid crime and tax evasion and constrain hance welfare and stimulate economic growth. However, monetary policy. Princeton University Press.
when network effects create barriers to entry and strength- [9] Grünewald, S. (2023). Digital euro and accountability of the en monopoly power, efficiency gains may be accompanied European Central Bank. Maastricht Journal of European and by reduced consumer welfare and weakened market com- Comparative Law, 30(4), 438-454. petition. [10] Alvarez, F., & Argente, D. (2020). Central bank digital The emergence of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CB- currencies: Foundational principles and core features. Bank of DCs) provides a potential solution to this dilemma. By International Settlements.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
