Can the Short-Selling System Restrain Corporate Financial Risk?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/jbbrmb96Keywords:
short-selling mechanism, margin trading, corporate financial risk, multiperiod DID, corporate governanceAbstract
This paper explores whether the margin trading and shortselling mechanism can suppress corporate financial risk (Li et al., 2024). Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2010 to 2023, we adopt the multiperiod difference-in-differences (DID) method to test the influence, moderating mechanisms and transmission paths of the short-selling mechanism on financial risk. The results indicate that: first, the short-selling mechanism notably mitigates corporate financial risk by restraining managerial opportunism and improving financial decisions (Mishra et al., 2024). Such results remain robust after replacing dependent variable, tail winsorization and placebo test. Second, corporate financial traits positively moderate the risk-mitigating impact of short-selling. Third, the inhibition effect shows significant heterogeneity, which is more evident in non-state-owned enterprises and firms with high information transparency (Xu & Lv, 2024). Fourth, the short-selling mechanism functions mainly through reducing agency costs and improving information disclosure quality, both of which act as partial mediators. This study enriches existing literature on capital market institutional governance and provides reliable empirical evidence for policy formulation.
References
ing transaction intensity of individual listed companies. [3] Wang, X. Y., & Wang, F. (2013). The impact of short selling The simple dichotomous indicator ignores the gaps in on stock volatility and liquidity. Economic Management Journal, continuous metrics including monthly short selling vol- 35(11), 118–127.
ume and short interest ratio across target firms, making [4] Xin, C. (2025). Securities lending short selling and corporate it impossible to reflect differentiated external monitoring financial risk: Evidence from multi-period DID model. Finance pressure generated by varying short-selling scales. Fol- & Economy, (01), 45–53.
low-up research can construct continuous short-selling in- [5] Fan, J. J. (2025). Excessive debt pressure, cross-border M&A tensity indicators based on monthly short transaction data and corporate financial risk. Communication of Finance and to achieve more precise measurement of short-selling’s Accounting, (18), 87–91.
external governance depth (Mishra et al., 2024). [6] He, L. J., & Wei, G. J. (2025). Coexistence of high Second, this paper only selects agency cost and infor- cash holding and high debt and corporate financial risk. mation disclosure quality as two mediating channels for Communication of Finance and Accounting, (20), 88–92.
empirical testing. Multiple potential transmission paths, [7] Hu, H. F., & Tian, Y. D. (2025). Internal capital market such as corporate financing constraints, capital investment operation and corporate financial risk exposure. Journal of efficiency and executives’ risk-taking tendencies, are ex- Hunan University (Social Sciences), 39(04), 34–47.
cluded from the mechanism analysis framework. Subse- [8] Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis quent scholars can incorporate multiple parallel mediating and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of variables to build a more comprehensive multi-channel Finance, 23(4), 589–609. transmission logic system (Xu & Lv, 2024). [9] Mishra, S., Öztekin, Ö., & Rahman, A. (2024). Short sellers Third, the current research does not take the heterogeand capital structure adjustments. Journal of Financial Research, neous regulatory effect caused by market cycles (bull vs. 47, 725–766. bear markets) and industrial attributes into consideration. [10] Li, X., Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). Margin trading and The risk-restraining function of short-selling activities stock tail risk in China’s A-share market. Pacific-Basin Finance may present distinct magnitudes under volatile market environments, so cyclical factors can be introduced as mod- Journal, 83, 102741.
erating variables in future research (Bris et al., 2007). [11] Xu, F., & Lv, X. (2024). Short selling, bank competition and Three feasible expansion directions are proposed for sub- corporate financing constraints. Journal of Financial Research, sequent studies. First, researchers can incorporate macro (6), 132–148.
indicators such as market sentiment and economic policy [12] Cheng, J. Y. (2026). Short-selling spillover effects on supply uncertainty to explore dynamic shifts in short-selling’s chain earnings management. Journal of Business and Economic risk suppression effect amid different market cycles (Li Studies, (3), 41–56.
et al., 2024). Second, this research can be combined [13] Bris, A., Goetzmann, W. N., & Zhu, N. (2007). Efficiency with popular research themes including corporate dig- and the bear: Short sales and market quality around the world. ital transformation and ESG performance, to examine Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 279–312. the cross-moderating impact of digital governance and
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
