Advertising Investment as a Supplement to Utility Theory: Explaining Chinese Luxury Consumers’ Behaviour 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/2nf3vz87Keywords:
Extended utility function, Advertising exposure, Social utility, Veblen effects, Price sensitivityAbstract
For a long time, China's luxury goods market has been dominated by neoclassical utility theory, but this theory cannot grasp the core symbolic value and social value of market behaviour. This study fills this research gap by constructing an extended utility model with advertising investment as the core endogenous variable and combining the preliminary survey data of Chinese luxury consumers in 2025. The model adds linear social utility terms to the logarithmic Cobb-Douglas utility function ( γ Ax ) to quantify the impact of advertising on payment willingness and budget allocation. The research results show that the traditional utility theory cannot explain China's luxury consumption, because advertising reshapes the utility function through the "Mianzi" social utility. Advertising shapes utility through multiple paths - including social dimensions, experience dimensions and financial dimensions - and presents significant income heterogeneity: the absolute increase in luxury spending of high-income consumers is greater, while the proportion of social utility of low-income consumers is higher. In all groups, advertising reduces price sensitivity and increases willingness to pay by embedding symbolic values. This research provides a quantifiable supplement to the traditional utility theory and lays the methodological foundation for modelling culture-specific consumer behaviour.
References
[1] Amaldoss, W. and Jain, S. (2005). Conspicuous Consumption and Sophisticated Thinking. Management Science, 51(10), pp.1449–1466. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/ stable/20110435.
[2] Arnold, E.J. and McCracken, G. (1989). Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. The Journal of American Folklore, 102(406). doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/541792.
[3] Dahiya, A., Banerji, D. and Filieri, R. (2024). Consumer well-being: a systematic literature review and future research directions. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 29(9). doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-12-2023-0355.
[4] Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.
[5] Chanel Limited (2024). Financial Results for the Year Ended 31 December 2023. London: Chanel limited. Available at: https://www.chanel.com/puls-img/1716301904618-pressrelease2 023resultsengfinalpdf.pdf.
[6] Dukes, A.J. and Liu, Q. (2023). The Consumption of Advertising in the Digital Age: Attention and Ad Content. Management Science, 70(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/ mnsc.2023.4793.
[7] Fox, A.H. (1957). A Theory of Second-Hand Markets. Economica, 24(94), p.99. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2551584.
[8] Henriksen, K. (2009). Luxury fever in China: An analysis of Chinese luxury consumption.
[9] Ikeya, E.S. (2025). Evolution of Luxury. Escholarship.org. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4h44r2q0.
[10] Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), pp.263– 291.
[11] Komlos, J. (2014). Behavioral Indifference Curves. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2463571.
[12] KPMG (2025). Luxury in the Midst of Change: Current Challenges and Future Pathways. KPMG. Available at: https:// assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/ch/pdf/luxury-report- 2025-en.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
[13] Krugman, H.E. (1972). Why Three Exposures May Be Enough. Journal of Advertising Research, 12(6), pp.11–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00218499.1972.12519370.
[14] MacKenzie, S.B. and Lutz, R.J. (1989). An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), pp.48–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1251413.
[15] Mandel, N., Petrova, P.K. and Cialdini, R.B. (2006). Images of Success and the Preference for Luxury Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), pp.57–69.
[16] McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), pp.71–84. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/ stable/2489287.
[17] Pentina, I., Guilloux, V. and Micu, A.C. (2018). Exploring Social Media Engagement Behaviors in the Context of Luxury Brands. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), pp.55–69. doi:https://doi. org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405756.
[18] Savills (2025). Global Luxury Retail 2025 Outlook. Savills. Available at: https://pdf.savills.com/documents/Global-Luxury- Retail-Outlook-2025.pdf
[19] Septianto, F., Seo, Y., Sung, B. and Zhao, F. (2020). Authenticity and exclusivity appeals in luxury advertising: the role of promotion and prevention pride. European Journal of Marketing, 54(6), pp.1305–1323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ ejm-10-2018-0690.
[20] Trigg, A.B. (2001). Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(1), pp.99–115.
[21] Veblen, T. (1992). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135373.
[22] Wu, S. (2025). The Psychology Behind Irrational Luxury Consumption: Impact of Brand Marketing and Secondhand Solutions. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 164(1), pp.41–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.54254/2754- 1169/2025.20726.
[23] Wu, Z. and Lin, Z. (2024). A Study of the Impact of Resident Income on Population Growth in China. Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Economics, Smart Finance and Contemporary Trade (ESFCT 2024), pp.256–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-548-5_28.
[24] Zhou, L. and Hui, M.K. (2003). Symbolic Value of Foreign Products in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Marketing, 11(2), pp.36–58. doi:https://doi. org/10.2307/25048932.
[25] Zielske, H.A. (1959). The Remembering and Forgetting of Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 23(3), p.239. doi:https://doi. org/10.2307/1248262. Dean&Francis Ziqi Zhao
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
