Analysis of Individual Income Tax Compliance in China from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics

Authors

  • Huantong Shi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/0eqj6q49

Keywords:

Behavioral Economics, Tax Appliance, Prospect Theory

Abstract

As an essential theory for studying the decision-making of “actors,” behavior economics can effectively analyze the problem of individual income tax compliance from the perspective of taxpayers’ psychology, which is of great theoretical significance for improving taxpayers’ willingness to comply. From the prospect theory, endowment effect, and mental accounting, the 2018 individual income tax reform can help enhance the level of voluntary personal income tax compliance and strengthen the tax compliance level; maintaining tax publicity helps to increase habitual individual income tax compliance level, optimizing tax service helps to increase the level of cooperative individual income tax compliance. In the future, we can further optimize the design of individual income tax policies, intensify tax publicity, and improve the quality of tax services. In the future, we can further optimize the design of individual income tax policies, increase tax publicity, and improve the quality of tax services to increase individual income tax compliance.

References

[1] Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,’ Econometrica, 47(2), p. 263. doi:10.2307/1914185.

[2] Allingham, M.G. and Sandmo, A. (1972) ‘Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis,’ Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), pp. 323–338. doi:10.1016/0047- 2727(72)90010-2.

[3] Thaler, R. (1980) ‘Toward a positive theory of Consumer Choice’, Journal of Economic Behavior & amp; Organization, 1(1), pp. 39–60. doi:10.1016/0167- 2681(80)90051-7.

[4] Akerlof, G.A. (1982) ‘Labor contracts as Partial Gift Exchange’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4), p. 543. doi:10.2307/1885099.

[5] Thaler, R. (1985) ‘Mental Accounting and consumer choice,’ Marketing Science, 4(3), pp. 199–214. doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199.

[6] Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L. and Thaler, R.H. (1986) ‘Fairness and the assumptions of Economics’, The Journal of Business, 59(S4). doi:10.1086/296367.

[7] Laibson, D. (1997) ‘Golden Eggs and hyperbolic discounting’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), pp. 443–478. doi:10.1162/003355397555253.

[8] McCaffery, E.J. and Slemrod, J. (2006) Behavioral Public Finance. New York: Russell Sage.

[9] Fengyu H. (2022) ‘Research on Individual Income Tax Reform from the Perspective of Behavioral Economics’, Taxation Research, 10(1), pp. 141–143. doi:10.19376/j.cnki.cn11-1011/f.2022.10.003. (Chinese)

[10] Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988) ‘Status quo bias in decision making’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), pp. 7–59. doi:10.1007/bf00055564.

[11] Aimei L. et al. (2007) ‘The Implicit Structure of Chinese Mental Accounts’, Acta Psychologica Sinica, 04(1), pp. 706–714.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-03