Does ESG Scoring Predict Lower Default Risks for Corporate Bonds in Developed Economies?

Authors

  • Zhen Chang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/avzp8c82

Keywords:

ESG Rating, Corporate Bonds, Default Risk, Credit Spreads, Sustainable Finance, Developed Economies, Regression Analysis

Abstract

The dissertation is an investigation on whether or not increased ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) scores will be correlated with reduced default risk of corporate bonds in developed economies. As the market of sustainable finance grows fast, and regulatory attention to ESG disclosure rises sharply, the correlation between ESG performance and credit risk is one of the most important issues to investors and policymakers. The study is on the case of corporate bonds in the United States, the United Kingdom, the Eurozone and Japan between 2018 and 2025. The quantitative methodology was chosen in terms of primary data analysis. MSCI and Bloomberg provided ESG ratings on a sample of 1,250 investment grade and highyield corporate bonds. Credit spreads and credit probability of default (PD) were used to measure default risk. The data sets were analysed with Pearson correlation, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and logistic regression to determine the predictive ability of the overall ESG scores and individual E, S and G pillars. The findings indicate that there is a statistically significant negative correlation between the ESG scores and the default risk. There were reduced credit spreads and reduced risk of default in higher ESG-rated bonds and the ESG scores accounted about 14. 2% of credit risk variation (pooled R 2 = 0.142). The environmental pillar presented the greatest predictive influence especially in Eurozone and Japan. This paper concludes that ESG scoring possesses moderate and significant predictive quality of lower default risk in developed markets of corporate bonds. Such results suggest the inclusion of ESG factors in the credit risk assessment and is applicable in practice to sustainable sustainable fixed-income portfolio construction and regulation.

References

Alahmadi, M. (2024). Optimizing Data Quality for Sustainable Development: An Integration of Green Finance with Financial Market Regulations. Sustainability, [online] 16(23), pp.10418– 10418. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310418.

Baldan, C. (2026) ‘The Impact of ESG Factors on Corporate Credit Risk: An Empirical Analysis of European Firms Using the Altman Z-Score’, Risks, 2(1), p. 2. Available at: https://www. mdpi.com/3042-6618/2/1/2 (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Chava, S. et al. (2026) ‘ESG and bond market resilience: Evidence from the Covid crisis’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 162, 107012. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0378426626000087 (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Ferriani, F. (2024) ‘ESG risks and corporate viability: insights from default probability term structure analysis’, Bank of Italy Occasional Paper No. 892. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/ p/bdi/opques/qef_892_24.html (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Fiorillo, P. (2025) ‘ESG performance and the cost of debt. Evidence from the primary corporate bond market’, International Review of Financial Analysis, 101, 105752. doi:10.1016/ j.irfa.2025.105752.

Gu, N. et al. (2025) ‘Beyond the Rating: How Disagreement Among ESG Agencies Affects Bond Credit Spreads’, Risks, Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6130 13(10), 206. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2227- 9091/13/10/206 (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Halling, M., Yu, J. and Zechner, J. (2022) ‘Primary Corporate Bond Markets and Social Responsibility’, Working Paper. Available at: https://www.eba.europa.eu/ sites/default/files/document_library/Calendar/Conference- Workshop/2022/11th%20Annual%20Research%20 Workshop%20-%20Technological%20Innovation%2C%20 Climate%20Finance%20and%20Banking%20Regulation/ Presentations%20and%20speeches/1044274/Session%203%20 -%20Paper%202%20Halling_Yu_Zechner_ESG_Primary%20 Corporate%20Bond%20Markets%20and%20Social%20 Responsibility.pdf (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Höck, A., Bauckloh, T., Dumrose, M. and Klein, C. (2023). ESG criteria and the credit risk of corporate bond portfolios. Journal of Asset Management, 24(7), pp.572–580. doi:https:// doi.org/10.1057/s41260-023-00337-w.

Hüb el, B. (2024) ‘ESG and corporate credit spreads’, Joint Research Centre Working Paper. Available at: https://jointresearch-centre.ec.europa.eu/document/download/05ed4197- 2445-4eab-9d16-84d5a4bda3a0_en (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Inderst, G. (2018) ‘Incorporating Environmental, Social and Governance Factors into Fixed Income Investment’, World Bank Global Program on Sustainability. Available at: https:// documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/913961524150628959/ pdf/Incorporating-environmental-social-and-governance-factorsinto-fixed-income-investment.pdf (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Jang, G.Y. (2020) ‘ESG Scores and the Credit Market’, Semantic Scholar. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3e55/781c 4aab426c880b193a88257f18710b2755.pdf (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Jiang, K. et al. (2025) ‘ESG disagreement and corporate debt maturity: evidence from China’, Financial Innovation, 11, 32. Available at: https://d-nb.info/1359076107/34 (Accessed: 20 March 2026). Korzeb, Z., Karkowska, R., Matysek-Jędrych, A. and Niedziółka,

P. (2024). How do ESG challenges affect default risk? An empirical analysis from the global banking sector perspective. Studies in Economics and Finance, 42(1). doi:https://doi. org/10.1108/sef-09-2023-0540.

Larsson, E. and Leuhusen, E. (2025). ESG Scores and Stock Performance Across Regulatory Regimes : A Quantitative Analysis of ESG Scores, Stock Performance, and Regulatory Stringency in Scandinavian and Asian Countries. [online] DIVA. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record. jsf?pid=diva2:1966550.

Lee, J. and Koh, K. (2024) ‘ESG performance and firm risk in the U.S. financial firms’, Review of Financial Economics, 42, pp. 328–344. Available at: https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cg i?article=1120&context=business_facpub (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Li, H. et al. (2026) ‘How ESG reshapes corporate bond valuation: risk pricing and rating interactions’, Applied Economics. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/400170574_How_ESG_reshapes_corporate_bond_ valuation_risk_pricing_and_rating_interactions (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Liu, S. (2025) ‘Statistical Assessment of Default Risks of Green Financial Bonds’, SHS Web of Conferences, 218, 02007. Available at: https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/ pdf/2025/09/shsconf_icdde2025_02007.pdf (Accessed: 20 March 2026). Magazzino, C., Arnone, M., Leogrande, A. and Gattone, T. (2025). Determinants of capital adequacy in global banking: key environmental, social, and governance indicators across countries. Eurasian Economic Review. doi:https://doi. org/10.1007/s40822-025-00346-7.

Okimoto, T. and Takaoka, S. (2024) ‘Sustainability and credit spreads in Japan’, International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 103012. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/abs/pii/S1057521923005689 (Accessed: 20 March 2026).

Zaini, A.P. (2023) ‘Can ESG Reduce Credit Risk? An Empirical Investigation’, International Conference on Management Research. Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1218&context=icmr (Accessed: 20 March 2026). Appendixces 8.1 Appendix A: Extended primary data table Date Region Issuer Example ESG Score Credit Spread (bp) PD (%) Interpretation 2019-06 United States Apple Inc. 82 68 0.45 High ESG, very low default risk 2020-03 Eurozone Siemens AG 78 92 0.78 COVID shock, moderate spread widening 2020-09 United Kingdom Unilever PLC 85 55 0.32 Strong ESG performance, narrow spread Dean&Francis Zhen Chang Date Region Issuer Example ESG Score Credit Spread (bp) PD (%) Interpretation 2021-02 Japan Toyota Motor Corp. 71 82 0.61 Average ESG, stable credit conditions 2021-11 United States Microsoft Corp. 88 42 0.28 Top ESG quartile, lowest risk in sample 2022-03 Eurozone TotalEnergies 64 145 1.35 Energy crisis, sharp spread increase 2022-07 United Kingdom BP PLC 58 168 1.82 Low ESG, elevated default probability 2023-01 Japan Sony Group 79 71 0.52 Post-crisis recovery, good ESG effect 2023-06 United States Johnson & Johnson 83 61 0.41 Strong ESG, consistent lowrisk profile 2023-10 Eurozone L'Oréal 87 48 0.29 Excellent ESG, narrowest spread 2024-02 United Kingdom HSBC Holdings 72 89 0.68 Moderate ESG, stable risk 2024-05 Japan Honda Motor Co. 69 95 0.74 Below-average ESG, higher spread 2024-09 United States Procter & Gamble 84 52 0.35 High ESG, reliable low default risk 2025-01 Eurozone Airbus SE 76 78 0.55 Solid ESG, moderate spread 2025-04 United Kingdom AstraZeneca 81 64 0.44 Positive ESG trend, reduced risk 2025-06 Japan Mitsubishi UFJ 66 112 0.98 Lower ESG, higher default probability 2025-08 United States Verizon Communications 74 85 0.62 Mid-tier ESG, average risk 2025-09 Eurozone SAP SE 86 49 0.31 Excellent ESG, very low spread 2025-10 United Kingdom GlaxoSmithKline 77 73 0.49 Strong ESG rating, stable performance 2025-12 Japan Canon Inc. 70 88 0.65 Average ESG, moderate default risk

Downloads

Published

2026-08-13