Does Stricter Environmental Regulation Curb Corporate Gr eenwashing? Evidence from China’s 2014 Environmental Protection Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/my2k5b75Keywords:
Greenwashing, 2014 Environmental Protection Law Amendment, green finance, environmental regulation, DIDAbstract
Amid growing public concern regarding climate change and environmental sustainability, corporate greenwashing, defined as the practice of misleadingly portraying firms as environmentally responsible, has emerged as a pivotal challenge in environmental governance. Understanding how regulatory interventions shape such behavior is crucial to fostering authentic corporate environmental responsibility. This paper investigates the impact of the 2014 revision of China’s Environmental Protection Law on listed firms’ greenwashing practices. Utilizing panel data from A-share listed companies spanning 2008 to 2024, this study employs a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to evaluate the law’s effectiveness. A novel greenwashing index is constructed by integrating positive environmental information disclosure (PEID, from 8 environmental management disclosure items in annual reports), green investment (from “Construction in Progress” notes), and environmental violation penalties (from the CSMAR database). Empirical results demonstrate a significant reduction in greenwashing following the law’s enactment, with the effect being particularly pronounced among state-owned enterprises. These findings underscore the effectiveness of stricter environmental regulation in mitigating symbolic corporate environmental claims and offer methodological and policy insights for future research and governance strategies.
References
Energy Economics 111 (2022): 106064. 5. Conclusion [2] Haijuan, Xie, et al. “Executive Environmental Awareness Through a DID analysis, the results suggest that the 2014 and Enterprise“Greenwashing Tendency.” East China Economic
amendment exerts a moderate yet statistically significant Management 38.12(2024):118-128.doi:10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/ inhibitory effect on greenwashing, underscoring the value f.240324017. of stringent environmental governance and regulatory [3] Jianxun Shi and Peiyuan Xin. “Can Market-Based enforcement. Furthermore, the heterogeneity analysis re- Environmental Regulations Curb Greenwashing by Publicly veals that state-owned enterprises are more responsive to Listed Companies? Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from the policy, primarily attributable to stricter governmental the Implementation of the Environmental Protection Tax Law.”
oversight and greater sensitivity to central policy direc- East China Economic Management. 39.09(2025):86-96. tives. In addition, regional heterogeneity is evident: the [4] Cao, Chaoyu, Qibo Chen, and Lili Zhu. “Corporate inhibitory effect of the policy is more pronounced in the Greenwashing Unexpectedly Caused by the Green Credit economically advanced eastern provinces, characterized Policy: A Comparison between Environmental Sustainability Dean&Francis Yiran Chen Information Disclosure and Actual Environmental Protection Firms in China. Investment from China’s Listed Companies.” Sustainability [9] Dagestani, Abd Alwahed, et al. “The impacts of urban 16.17 (2024): 7369. development orientation of resource-based cities on [5] Zhou, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Environmental environmental information disclosure and greenwashing disclosure greenwashing” and corporate value: the premium behavior of listed firms in China.” Environment, Development
effect and premium devalue of environmental information. and Sustainability (2024): 1-26.
Corp. Soc. Respons. Environ. Manag. 1–15. 2023. https://doi. [10] Lingdi Zhao and Xiaofei Wang. “Can Corporate Green org/10.1002/csr.2698. Investment and Green Expenditure Improve Business [6] Zhou, Yiqiang, and Lianghua Chen. “Public attention and Performance? — An Empirical Analysis Based on the EBM and “Environmental Disclosure Greenwashing”: pressure from Panel Tobit Models.” JOURNAL OF BEIJING INSTITUTE oversight or incentive from legitimacy.” China Finance Review OF TECHNOLOGY (SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION)
International. 2024. 24.03(2022):28-42. doi:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2022.1049. [7] Xinhong Xue and Jiaxing Cheng. “The Impact of Green [11] Ailing, Pan, et al. “Can Green Mergers and Acquisitions Finance Policies on Greenwashing Behavior of Chinese Under Media Pressure Promote Substantive Transformation Listed Companies.” Journal of North China University of of Heavily Polluting Enterprises?.”China Industrial
Water Resources and Electric Power( Social Science Edition) Economics. 02(2019):174-192. doi:10.19581/j.cnki. 40.06(2024):28-39. doi:10.13790/j.ncwu.sk.2024.068. ciejournal.20190131.005. [8] Jiang, Hai, Zhiyuan Ning, and Zhitao Lin. “Does Local [12] Environmental Management Disclosure table. CSMAR, Government Environmental Target Affect Firms’ Greenwashing? https://data.csmar.com/ Evidence from Listed Firms in China.” Evidence from Listed
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
