A New Decision Making Strategy: Combining Markov Chain Market Prediction with Kelly Criterion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/bp0qyt68Keywords:
Kelly Criterion, Markov chain, dynamic position sizing, market state identification, optimal investment strategyAbstract
In some cases, solely relying on the traditional Kelly Criterion, which assumes fixed win and lose rates, is insufficient to cope with the constantly changing market environment. Some present attempts to develop an improved decision-making model combine the Kelly Criterion with a Markov chain, but they are either too complex or have limitations. To figure out a better method, this paper carries out research on dynamic position decision-making. A Markov chain model divides the market into two states by analyzing a state transition probability matrix based on historical price movements. These two states represent increasing and declining market conditions, respectively. Then, the Kelly Criterion is used to calculate the optimal position corresponding to each state, enabling state-dependent position sizing. Each step is easy to apply and does not require much calculation, making the method accessible for practical investment decisions. This novel and simple strategy forms a twostep decision-making system including state identification and position optimization. Empirical results from an A-share stock demonstrate that this dynamic strategy outperforms the static Kelly approach, offering improved cumulative returns while maintaining simplicity and ease of implementation.
References
[1] BORKOWSKA A O, KROESE D P. Optimal betting under Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6130 Markov chain dynamics with application to sports & finance. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2403.08719, 2024. https://arxiv.org/ abs/2403.08719.
[2] NYSTRUP P, MADSEN H, LINDSTRÖM E. Dynamic portfolio optimization across hidden market regimes. Quantitative Finance, 2018, 18(1): 1-13.
[3] PASRICHA P, SELVAMUTHU D, D'AMICO G, et al. Portfolio optimization of credit risky bonds: a semi-Markov process approach. Financial Innovation, 2020, 6(1): 51.
[4] LYNCH R, TAYLOR M P. Optimal Kelly strategies for hidden Markov models. Quantitative Finance, 2022, 22(10): 1689-1706.
[5] LI Y, ZHANG X. Kelly criterion for Markovian switching jump-diffusion models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2023, 111: 212-227.
[6] LIU J, CHEN Y. Robust Kelly criterion for Markov chains with uncertain transition matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 2025, 302(2): 568-582.
[7] ANDERSSON M, VÄHÄMAA S. Hidden Markov modelbased regime switching and dynamic portfolio management. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, 48: 213-226.
[8] ZHAO Y, MACLEAN L C. Kelly investing with downside risk control in a regime-switching market. Quantitative Finance, 2022, 22(1): 75-94.
[9] KULL A. A novel derivation and interpretation of the Kelly criterion. Journal of Risk, 2025, 27(3). LILLO F, MAZZARISI P, TSAKNAKI I Y. Tackling estimation risk in Kelly investing using options. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2508.18868, 2025.
[10] ZHAO Y, MACLEAN L C. Kelly investing with downside risk control in a regime-switching market. Quantitative Finance, 2022, 22(1): 75-94.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
