Modeling Income: A Regression-Based Econometric Analysis of How Age, Gender, and Education Influence Income
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/d85c3x20Keywords:
Income inequality, Human capital, Educa-tion, Gender, PSIDAbstract
Income inequality is a persistent issue in economics and public policy, as it influences opportunities for individuals and affects broader patterns of social mobility and economic fairness. Understanding the factors that drive differences in earnings is therefore essential for both researchers and policymakers. This study uses data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) to build a multiple nonlinear regression model that explores how age, gender, and education affect income. To capture the possible nonlinear relationship between age and income, a quadratic term is added for age, and a log transformation is applied to income to reduce skewness. The regression results show that income generally follows an inverted U-shaped trend with age. While gender shows a borderline significant effect, education does not appear to be statistically significant in this model. After applying regression without education, the fit of the model did not improve noticeably. Although the overall explanatory power of the model is limited, it still reflects important ideas from human capital theory. Therefore, the study highlights several limitations, including the oversimplification of the model and the exclusion of relevant variables such as race and occupation. Taking these factors into account and drawing on the insights from previous research, the report concludes with policy implications and recommendations for future studies.
References
[1] Borjas, George J., and Jan C. Van Ours. Labor Economics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010.
[2] Checchi, Daniele. “Education, Inequality and Income Inequality.” 2001.
[3] Lee, Jong-Wha, and Hyeok Yong Lee. “Human Capital and Income Inequality.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, vol. 23, no. 4, 2018, pp. 554–583.
[4] Aqil, Muhammad, and Diah Wahyuniati. “The Effect of Human Capital Inequality on Income Inequality: Evidence from Indonesia: An Application of Generalized Method of Moment Estimation.” Proceedings of The International Conference on Data Science and Official Statistics, vol. 1, 2021, pp. 358–372.
[5] Lee, Ronald, et al. “Charting the Economic Life Cycle.” 2006.
[6] Myck, Michal. “Wages and Ageing: Is There Evidence for the ‘Inverse-U’ Profile?” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 72, no. 3, 2010, pp. 282–306.
[7] Rawal, Shalik Ram. “A Linear Regression Study of the Effects of Age on Income in the Godawari Municipality, Lalitpur.” Pakistan Social Sciences Review, vol. 6, no. 4, 2022, pp. 52–61.
[8] Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Public Use Data. Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 2023. https://psidonline.isr.umich. edu/. Accessed 26 July 2025.
[9] Ozhamaratli, Filiz, et al. “A Generative Model for Age and Income Distribution.” EPJ Data Science, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–26.
[10] Card, David. “The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings.” Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 1801–1863.
[11] Xie, Rui. “The Influence of Education Level, Gender, Race, Marital Status, Age, and Occupation on the Wage of the General Population.” 2022 7th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2022), Atlantis Press, 2022, pp. 926–932.
[12] Zhou, Michael, and Ramin Ramezani. A Deep Dive into the Factors Influencing Financial Success: A Machine Learning Approach. arXiv:2405.08233, 2024.
[13] Murphy, Kevin M., and Finis Welch. “Empirical Age- Earnings Profiles.” Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 8, no. 2, 1990, pp. 202–229.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
