Urban Primacy, Innovation Capacity, and Spatial Spillover Effects: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/n20acd93Keywords:
Innovation, urban primacy, spatial spilloverAbstract
Against the backdrop of innovation-driven development, this research explores how urban innovation capacity exhibits spatial spillover effects, particularly in relation to urban primacy. Drawing on panel data from 33 cities in Jiangsu, Hubei, and Sichuan provinces between 2002 and 2022, this study constructs a Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) incorporating bi-directional fixed effects and spatial distance weights. The analysis controls economic scale, industrial structure, R&D expenditure, education level, urban size, foreign direct investment, and infrastructure. Results reveal pronounced spatial heterogeneity: Jiangsu exhibits significant positive spatial linkages, where urban primacy suppresses local and overall innovation but slightly promotes that of neighboring areas, indicating a “coordinated-driven” pattern. In contrast, Hubei exhibits negative spatial correlation, with primacy effects being statistically insignificant. In Sichuan, primacy positively affects both local and neighboring innovation, yet the overall spatial spillover remains negative, suggesting a “siphon effect.” Policy implications highlight the need for strengthening monocentric structures in less developed regions to foster aggregate innovation, while more advanced areas should transition toward polycentric urban systems to mitigate siphoning and promote balanced, highquality development.
References
[1] Wen Z, Shao X. Do Spatial Spillovers of Technology Transfer Networks Impact Urban Innovation Capacity? Evidence from Chinese Cities. Regional Science and Environmental Economics, 2025, 2(2): 12.
[2] Shi Y, Zhai W, Yan Y, Wang X. The Influence of Proximity on the Evolution of Urban Innovation Networks in Nanjing Metropolitan Area, China: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technological Innovations. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2024, 13(8): 273.
[3] Chen D, Xiao Y, Huang K, Li X. Research on the Correlation and Influencing Factors of Digital Technology Innovation in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area. Sustainability, 2022, 14(22): 14864.
[4] Zhou R, Zhang Y, Gao X. The Spatial Interaction Effect Dean&Francis He Wang of Environmental Regulation on Urban Innovation Capacity: Empirical Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(9): 4470.
[5] Yang B, Zhang H, Fan F, Huang R. Mapping the structural evolution of intercity patent transfer constrained by space: a case study of China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2024: 1-18.
[6] Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013, 4.
[7] Ye S. The Impact of Cities‘ Embedding in the Global Value Chain on the High-Quality Development of Urbanization. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2025.
[8] He M, Fan Z, Chen Y. Impact of enhancing national autonomous innovation demonstration zones on cities’ efficiency in technological innovation. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 25077.
[9] Wan G, Yang D, Zhang Y. Why Asia and China have lower urban concentration and urban primacy. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 2016, 22(1): 90-105.
[10] Ioannou S, Wójcik D. Finance, Globalization, and Urban Primacy. Economic Geography, 2021, 97(1): 34-65.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
