The Impact of the 2010 Housing Purchase Restriction on Commercial Housing Prices in Beijing: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/84k5bh56Keywords:
Housing purchase restriction, Commercialhousing price, Difference-in-differences, ChinaAbstract
This paper examines the impact of the 2010 housing purchase restrictions on Beijing’s commercial housing prices. The data are monthly from January 2009 to December 2010. A Differences-in-Differences model is employed, with Wuxi serving as the control city. The aim of this study is to determine whether the policy helped to cool down the housing market. The results show that, instead of falling, Beijing’s commercial housing prices increased after the policy. This may be because many people rushed to buy homes before stricter rules took effect, local families were still allowed to purchase more than one property, and the policy signaled that housing would become more limited and valuable. The study suggests that purchase restrictions alone are not enough to control prices; they should be combined with financial tools, such as higher down payments or different mortgage rates, along with supply-side reforms and city-specific policies. The case of Beijing demonstrates that housing policies can lead to unexpected outcomes, highlighting the need for careful design to improve their effectiveness.
References
ceived value. Overall, the rise in demand from precaution- [1] Deng, Y., Gyourko, J., & Wu, J. (2012). Land and house ary buying, combined with limited supply adjustments, price measurement in China. NBER Working Paper Series, offers a plausible explanation for the immediate price 18403. National Bureau of Economic Research.
increases following the implementation of the restriction. [2] Fang, H., Gu, Q., Xiong, W., & Zhou, L. A. (2016). Demystifying the Chinese housing boom. NBER Macroeconomics 5. Recommendations Annual, 30(1), 105–166. [3] Glaeser, E. L., Huang, W., Ma, Y., & Shleifer, A. (2017). The findings show that housing purchase restrictions, A real estate boom with Chinese characteristics. *Journal of although intended to reduce speculative demand, can Economic Perspectives*, 31(1), 93–116.
have unintended short-term effects. In Beijing, the policy [4] Wu, J., Deng, Y., & Gyourko, J. (2012). Evaluating caused a price increase, likely due to precautionary buy- conditions in major Chinese housing markets. Regional Science ing and the perception that eligibility had become limited. and Urban Economics, 42(3), 531–543. This indicates that such restrictions should be combined [5] Chivakul, M., Lam, R. W., Liu, X., Maliszewski, W., & with financial measures, like higher down payments or
Schipke, A. (2015). Understanding residential real estate in varied mortgage rates for second-home buyers, to target China (IMF Working Paper No. 15/84). International Monetary speculation without causing panic buying. The policy de- Fund. sign should also be more balanced; allowing local house- [6] Wu, Y., & Li, Y. (2017). Impact of government intervention holds to buy more properties while restricting non-locals might create loopholes and reinforce exclusivity, which in the housing market: Evidence from the housing purchase Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6130
restriction policy in China. Applied Economics, 50(6), 691–705. [9] Sun, W., Zheng, S., Geltner, D., & Wang, R. (2017). The [7] Zheng, H., Zhang, R., & Wu, J. (2022). Value of qualification housing market effects of local home purchase restrictions: to buy a house: Evidence from the housing purchase restriction Evidence from Beijing. Journal of Housing Economics, 35, policy in China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51–65. 203, 282–301. [10] Yang, Y. (2024). The impact of real estate purchase [8] Lu, Z., Zhang, S., & Hong, J. (2021). Examining the impact restriction policy on urban economic development: A case study of home purchase restrictions on China’s housing market. China of Beijing. Highlights in Business, Economics, and Management, Economic Review, 67, 101603. 41, 189–196.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
