Does Accrual-Based Pay Sensitivity Improve Firm Value? Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Authors

  • Lingkun Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/2rrcnq49

Keywords:

Accrual-Based Pay–Performance Sensitivity (PPS), Separation of Ownership and Control, Firm Value

Abstract

This study employed data from non-financial listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets between 2000 and 2024 to construct an accrual-based profit-sharing performance sensitivity (PPS) metric. It examines the impact of such PPS on future firm value and introduces dual ownership separation (the gap between control rights and cash flow rights) as a moderating variable. It examines the impact of such PPS on future firm value and introduces dual ownership separation (the gap between control rights and cash flow rights) as a moderating variable. However, separation of ownership and control weakens this positive relationship, albeit with limited statistical significance, while separation itself exerts no significant direct effect on corporate value. The findings indicate that under China’s context of concentrated shareholding and prevalent earnings management, the incentive efficacy of PPS is constrained by governance structures. This study recommends strengthening earnings quality regulation, optimising disclosure practices, protecting minority shareholders, and tailoring compensation contract design to equity structures to enhance incentive effectiveness and corporate value.

References

[1] Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.

[2] Mlawu L, Matenda F R, Sibanda M. Incentives for accrualbased earnings management in emerging economies— A systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis. Administrative Sciences, 2025, 15(6): 209.

[3] Jiang F, Kim K A. Corporate governance in China: A survey. Review of Finance, 2020, 24(4): 733-772.

[4] Wang C H, Chang C H, Lee Z C R. Business-to-business platform ecosystem practices and their impacts on firm performance: evidence from high-tech manufacturing firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2022, 33(5): 1005-1026.

[5] Zheng J, Guo F. Digital financial supervision and inefficient investment of enterprises: Evidence from China’s internet financial industry. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2024, 83: 102255.

[6] Hiemann M. Accrual accounting in performance measurement and the separation of ownership and control. The Accounting Review, 2023, 98(7): 289-314.

[7] Ye J, Al-Fadly A, Quang Huy P, Quang Ngo T, Phi Hung D D, Hoang Tien N. The nexus among green financial development and renewable energy: Investment in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2022, 35(1): 5650-5675.

[8] Infuehr J. Relative performance evaluation and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2022, 39(1): 607-627.

[9] Chen Y, Cheng C A, Li S, Zhao J. The monitoring role of the media: Evidence from earnings management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2021, 48(3-4): 533-563.

[10] Reis N, Vargas Magaña G, Vélez Villegas S. Water, finance and financialisation: A review. Water Alternatives, 2024, 17(2): 266-291.

[11] Rock E B, Rubinfeld D L. Common ownership and coordinated effects. Antitrust Law Journal, 2020, 83(1): 201- 252.

[12] Vélez F Y M, Avalos L P. Effects of explicit permissive rules on behavior patterns in a common resources situation. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2024, 25(1): 108-127.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19