Financial Asset Allocation Structure and Enterprirfrffzse Investment Efficiency: An Analysis Based on Industry Heterogeneity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/j8x9wv20Keywords:
Financial asset allocation, enterprise investment efficiency, industry heterogeneityAbstract
Under the background of digital transformation and supplyside reform, enterprises are facing increasingly severe challenges in asset allocation. Although the increase in the proportion of financial assets in non-financial enterprises helps to diversify risks, it is often associated with a decline in investment efficiency. Industry heterogeneity intensifies this issue: high-turnover industries such as technology can benefit from flexible allocation, while low-turnover industries such as real estate face the risk of idle resources. This study examines the impact of financial asset allocation structure on the investment efficiency of enterprises, with a particular focus on industry heterogeneity based on capital turnover efficiency. The research suggests that the optimal allocation can enhance the investment efficiency of high-turnover industries by diversifying risks and reducing reliance on cash, but it will inhibit the investment efficiency of low-turnover industries due to capital occupation and the phenomenon of moving away from the real economy and towards virtualization.Using the group regression method, industries were divided into two groups based on the median asset turnover rate. Through the fixed effect model, the long-term and short-term asset allocation ratios were regressed on efficiency proxy indicators such as Tobin’s Q and Return on Assets (ROA), while controlling for variables such as enterprise size and age. The research results support the dual heterogeneity effect: the short-term allocation in the high-turnover group has a positive impact, while the overall allocation in the low-turnover group has a negative impact.
References
efficiency; conversely, long- term allocation may trig- Research Letters, 2024, 62(3): 105-138. ger the speculative effect, occupying funds for physical [2] Wang Y, Hao W, Haitao S. Financial technology and investment and promoting the de-industrialization and efficiency of enterprise investment: an empirical study based on towards virtualization phenomenon, which hurts invest- China’s listed companies. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. ment efficiency. This conclusion is consistent with the [3] Guevara Ó J, Riutort J. Strengthening secured creditors: theories related to asset allocation and investment effi- implications on debt financing and investment. Journal Of
ciency. The empirical results of the full sample show that Corporate Finance, 2024, 84(4): 102-105. the short-term asset coefficient is significantly positive [4] Aktar M, Abedin M Z, Gupta A D. The impact of monetary (β1 = 15.2***), and the long-term asset coefficient is sig- policy shocks on corporate dynamic investment activity with
nificantly negative (β2 = -10.8*). Furthermore, industry financial heterogeneity. SAGE Open, 2021, 11(1): 21-58. heterogeneity plays a crucial regulatory role: In industries [5] Gong C M, Gong P, Jiang M. Corporate financialization with higher capital turnover efficiency, such as retail and and investment efficiency: evidence from China. Pacific-Basin technology, financial asset allocation has a positive impact
Finance Journal, 2023, 79(8): 102-145. on investment efficiency. The regression coefficient is sig- [6] Guo K, Guo X, Zhang J. Financial asset allocation duality nificantly positive, and enterprises can enhance their risk and enterprise upgrading: empirical evidence from the diversification capabilities, increase investment returns, and reduce reliance on cash through optimized allocation; Chinese A-share market. Humanities And Social Sciences Communications, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
