Building Resilience: A Framework for Maritime Supply Chain Risk Management in Logistics Enterprise

Authors

  • Qing Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/r6hgb411

Keywords:

Maritime Supply Chain, Risk Management, Supply Chain Resilience, Data Collaboration, Logistics Optimization

Abstract

In an era of profound shifts in global trade patterns and heightened uncertainties, maritime supply chain risk management faces critical challenges that traditional mechanisms struggle to address. This study investigates the core impediments to resilient development in maritime supply chains for logistics enterprises. Through a systematic analysis, it identifies three systemic bottlenecks: (1) a governance gap where traditional risk management mechanisms fail to cope with novel risks; (2) a collaboration gap stemming from disparate data standards that hinder industry-wide synergy; and (3) an investment gap characterized by the high costs and uncertain returns of building resilience. These three types of issues impede the resilient development of the maritime supply chain and also prevent enterprises from responding to supply chain risks and disruptions. To address these gaps, this paper proposes a multi-faceted solution: integrating resilience metrics into strategic performance appraisal systems, constructing a cost-resilience curve model to identify optimal investment timing, promoting data-sharing platforms and industry partnerships, and innovating with rental service models to lower the barrier to entry for SMEs. Finally, it emphasizes the need for multi-party collaborative efforts among the government, associations, and enterprises to build a flexible, efficient, economically sustainable, and highly resilient supply chain system.

References

[1] Bag, Surajit, and Sachin Kumar Mangla. Investigating the role of smart and resilient supplier management practices in the circular economy: a supply chain practice view perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2025, 34(4): 3919-3939.

[2] Morris Cohen, Cui Shiliang, Sebastian Doetsch, Ricardo Ernst, Arnd Huchzermeier, Panos Kouvelis, Hau Lee, Hirofumi Matsuo, Andy A. Tsay. Bespoke supply‐chain resilience: the gap between theory and practice. Journal of Operations Management, 2022, 68(5), 515-531.

[3] Hussain Ghulam, Nazir Mian Sajid, Rashid Muhammad Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6130 Amir, Sattar Maheen Abdul. From supply chain resilience to supply chain disruption orientation: the moderating role of supply chain complexity. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 36(1), 70-90.

[4] Lucker, Florian, Timonina-Farkas, Anna, Seifert, Ralf W. Balancing resilience and efficiency: A literature review on overcoming supply chain disruptions. Production and Operations Management, 34(6), 1495-1511.

[5] Yin, Hengbin et al. A study on the assessment of risk management performance in maritime start-ups: evidence from China. Maritime Policy & Management, 2022, 50(6), 818–832.

[6] Zhou Yusheng, Kum Fai Yuen. Prepare for the sustainability era: A quantitative risk analysis model for container shipping sustainability-related risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 475, 143661.

[7] Pruyn, Jeroen, and Edwin van Hassel. Frontiers in Maritime Transport Chains: Digital and Organizational Innovations in Maritime Transport and Port Operations. Frontiers in Future Transportation, 2022, 3: 869530.

[8] Yui-yip Lau, Qiong Chen, Mark Ching-Pong Poo, Adolf K.Y. Ng, Chung Chui Ying. Maritime transport resilience: A systematic literature review on the current state of the art, research agenda and future research directions. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2024, 251, 107086.

[9] Stephanie Galaitsi, Margaret Kurth, &Lgor Linkov Resilience: Directions for an uncertain future following the COVID‐19 pandemic. GeoHealth, 2021, 5(11), e2021GH000447.

[10] Shang Tianyu, Wu Hao, Wang Kun, Dong Yang, Jiang Changmin, Yang Hangjun. Would the shipping alliance promote or discourage green shipping investment?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2024, 128, 104102.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19