The Role of Independent Directors in Corporate Governance and Their Impact on Over-Investment

Authors

  • Ziqiao Miao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/qw0ztq02

Keywords:

Independent directors, corporate governance, overinvestment, agency theory, board effectiveness

Abstract

This article systematically reviews the role and challenges of independent directors in curbing overinvestment in enterprises. Based on the agency theory framework, this article analyzes the theoretical path for independent directors to improve investment efficiency through supervision, consultation, and signal transmission mechanisms. Research has found that although independent directors theoretically have governance effectiveness, their actual effectiveness is significantly constrained by practical difficulties such as lack of independence, information barriers, and insufficient incentives. This article further reveals the situational dependence of independent director effectiveness and points out that its effectiveness is deeply influenced by institutional environment and equity structure. Finally, The research findings of this paper show that this article proposes policy recommendations for shifting from formal compliance to substantive effectiveness, including optimizing the selection mechanism and improving the incentive compatibility system. This study provides important insights into the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms and has reference value for governance practices in emerging markets.

References

[1] Meckling W H, Jensen M C. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.

[2] Jensen M C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 1986, 76(2): 323-329.

[3] Fama E F, Jensen M C. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26(2): 301-325.

[4] Clarke D C. The independent director in Chinese corporate governance. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 2025.

[5] CSRC. Measures for the administration of independent directors of listed companies. 2023.

[6] Li Y, Li N, Lawrence L H W. Independent directors with auditing expertise, overconfident CEOs and overinvestment in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2025, 91(1): 102-107.

[7] Xu R, Wang W, Li C, Fang M. Do independent directors’ scientific achievements matter? Evidence from over-investment of Chinese listed firms. 2022.

[8] OECD. G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. OECD Publishing, 2025.

[9] Hermalin B E, Weisbach M S. Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 2023.

[10] Beasley M S, Clune R, Hermanson D R. Enterprise risk management: an empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2025, 24(6): 521-531.

[11] Ma J, Khanna T. Independent directors’ dissent on boards: evidence from listed companies in China. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(8): 1547-1557.

[12] Tang X. Independent directors in China. In Puchniak D, Baum H, Nottage L (Eds.), Independent Directors in Asia. Cambridge University Press, 2017, 26(5): 208-240.

[13] Eisenhardt K M. Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(1): 57-74.

[14] Richardson S. Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 2006, 11(2): 159-189.

[15] Chen Z, Ke B, Yang Z. The role of independent directors in corporate investment efficiency: new evidence from a quasinatural experiment in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2021, 69(5): 101-109.

[16] Crespí-Cladera R, Pascual-Fuster B. Does the independence of independent directors matter? Journal of Corporate Finance, 2024, 28(23): 116-134.

[17] Brick I E, Chidambaran N K. Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2010, 16(4): 533-553.

[18] Wijethilake C, Ekanayake A. CEO duality and firm performance: the moderating roles of CEO informal power and board involvements. Social Responsibility Journal, 2021, 16(8): 1453-1474.

[19] Xu L C, Zhu T, Lin Y M. Politician control, agency problems, and ownership reform: evidence from China. In The Revival of Private Enterprise in China. Routledge, 2016, 22(3): 199-222.

[20] Kang S Y. The independent director system in China: weaknesses, dilemmas, and potential silver linings. Tsinghua China Law Review, 2022.

[21] He Y W, Hamdan S L, Mohd Faizal S. The impact of busy independent directors on the post-IPO operating performance of Chinese companies. Cogent Business & Management, 2025, 12(1): 250-289.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19