The Impact of Climate Change on Investment Risks of Agricultural Enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/bh74se56Keywords:
Climate change, agribusiness investment risks, case comparison, risk transmission pathways, multi-stakeholder collaborationAbstract
In the current context of accelerated global warming, frequent and increasingly severe extreme weather events, agricultural comprehensive enterprises are mired in unprecedented investment uncertainty. This article focuses on the transmission mechanism of climate change impacts and conducts in-depth research using a dual “physical transformation” framework. In the research process, a comprehensive literature review was used to sort out the theoretical basis, path analysis was used to clarify the impact path, and cross case comparisons were used to obtain diverse experiences, in order to track how the impact of farm level disasters spreads and spreads through the supply chain to asset and credit channels. Using Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Limited by Share Ltd (Yili) and Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), two leading companies in the industry, as empirical samples, accurately quantify the impact of extreme weather conditions such as droughts and floods, as well as carbon regulations on feed costs, raw material price fluctuations, and corporate valuations. The results show that climate risks vary by scenario and spread widely along the value chain. The company’s own attributes and geographical layout lead to differences in risk exposure. Diversified procurement, technological upgrades, and policy coordination are key measures to effectively mitigate losses, providing replicable analysis templates and decision-making toolkits for agricultural investors.
References
time, it cooperated with Brazilian farms to promote rain - [1] IPCC. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. resistant soybean varieties, reducing the raw material loss Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report rate by 10%. of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge At the policy level, government subsidies and risk - shar- University Press, 2021. ing mechanisms can significantly reduce the transfor- [2] Lobell D B, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J. Climate
mation costs of enterprises. For example, Yili’s northern trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 2011, pastures received a 30% subsidy for the purchase of envi- 333(6042): 616-620.
ronmental protection equipment due to their participation [3] FAO. The state of food and agriculture 2020. Food And in the local government’s “climate - resilient agriculture Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations, 2020. pilot project”, reducing the cost pressure of a single pas- [4] Zhao C, Liu B, Piao S, et al. Temperature increase reduces
ture by 6 million yuan. ADM’s processing plants in the global wheat yield. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(5): 354- United States enjoyed tax relief due to the adoption of low 358. - carbon technologies, saving over 40 million US dollars [5] Schlenker W, Roberts M J. Nonlinear temperature effects in taxes in 2023. indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate At the technological level, digital tools improve the efchange. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, ficiency of risk response. For example, Yili deployed an 2009, 106(37): 15594-15598. IoT - based temperature and humidity monitoring system [6] Yang Y, Tilman D, Jin Z, et al. Climate change exacerbates in its pastures, which can predict drought risks 7 - 10
days in advance. In 2024, the efficiency of emergency the environmental impacts of agriculture. Science, 2024, feed reserves in pastures increased by 25%. ADM used 385(6713): eadn3747.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
