The Relationship Between Corporate ESG Ratings and Initial Public Offering Pricing Efficiency

Authors

  • Qirun Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/6q6hds41

Keywords:

ESG, initial public offering, greenwashing

Abstract

This paper takes the United States market as its research object to explore the relationship between the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings of enterprises and the pricing efficiency of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs). Traditional IPO literature mostly explains the phenomenon of underpricing on the first day from the aspects of information asymmetry, underwriter reputation and market sentiment. Yet, the role of ESG, as an emerging non-financial factor, remains underexplored. This paper analyzes the potential impact of ESG on pricing efficiency from three perspectives: information asymmetry, investor demand, and institutional certification. It also examines the moderating effects of external guarantees and rating differences. The research shows that ESG disclosure can enhance transparency, boost investor confidence, and reduce underpricing under certain conditions. However, greenwashing and rating inconsistency may weaken its signaling function, leading to resource misallocation. This paper expands the theoretical framework of IPO pricing efficiency and provides empirical references and practical inspirations for regulatory authorities, issuers and investors when utilizing ESG information.

References

the perspectives of information asymmetry, underwriter over time? Financial Management, 2024, 33(3): 5-37. reputation, market sentiment, and institutional environ- [2] Katsafados A G, Androutsopoulos I, Chalkidis I, Fergadiotis ment. Yet, little consensus has been reached regarding the M. Textual information and IPO underpricing: a machine role of ESG, as an emerging non-financial factor, in the learning approach. ResearchGate, 2020. IPO pricing process. With the rise of sustainable investing [3] Lowry M, Officer M S, Schwert G W. The variability of IPO

and the evolution of regulatory frameworks, ESG has be- initial returns. Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(2): 425-465. come a central issue in global capital markets. Clarifying [4] Boulton T J. Mandatory ESG disclosure, information its role in IPO pricing efficiency, therefore, carries both asymmetry, and litigation risk: evidence from initial public academic value and practical significance. offerings. European Financial Management, 2024. From the perspective of information asymmetry, ESG [5] Fama E F, French K R. Disagreement, tastes, and asset

disclosure and ratings serve as additional signals that help prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 83(3): 667-689. reduce investors’ uncertainty about firm quality. From the [6] Pástor L, Stambaugh R F, Taylor L A. Dissecting green investor demand perspective, strong ESG performance

returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 2022, 146(2): 403-424. may attract responsible investment funds and green inves- [7] Schmunkamp P. How does ESG ratings influence IPO’s tors, enhance subscription enthusiasm, and improve offerunderpricing? Evidence from the US market. Journal of ing prices. From the institutional certification perspective,

Economics & Management Research, 2025, 6(1): 1-8. underwriters, institutional investors, and third-party assurance strengthen the credibility of ESG information, there- [8] Duong L, Luong H, Nguyen L, Wang Z. Mandatory ESG by indirectly enhancing market trust. While these three disclosure and IPO underpricing worldwide. 2023 FMA Annual perspectives provide distinct explanatory pathways, they Meeting, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19