The Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Debt Financing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/q53ndm60Keywords:
ESG Performance, Corporate Debt Financing, Financing Cost, Credit Risk, ESG-Aligned CapitalAbstract
Recently, the focus of global businesses has expanded from solely concentrating on financial results to incorporating sustainability assessments. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles have now become crucial in evaluating long-term corporate value. Although an increasing number of firms are adopting ESG practices, the impact of ESG on debt financing—specifically in terms of costs, terms, and access to capital—remains unclear, particularly across different regions and industries. To address this gap, the present study examines nine key academic studies spanning from 2011 to 2022, as well as case studies of non-financial listed firms in both developed (EU, US) and emerging (China) markets, such as Nestle, Microsoft, and Toyota. Utilizing ESG ratings from MSCI, Sustainalytics, and Bloomberg, the study analyzes various debt indicators, including interest rates and bond yields. The study reveals that strong ESG performance significantly reduces financing costs by 10 to 25 basis points through lower credit risk and attracts more ESG - aligned capital, as seen in Toyota’s oversubscribed 2022 ESG bonds. Additionally, ESG’s impact varies by industry, with the energy sector benefiting from environmental improvements and the retail sector from strong social practices. Overall, ESG serves as both a “risk mitigator” and a “capital magnet” in debt financing. This study underscores the importance of integrating ESG into financial strategies and offers valuable guidance for lenders, investors, and regulators.
References
[1] Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Corporate environmental disclosure and information asymmetry. Accounting Review, 89(1), 35-65.
[2] Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2358-2376. Dean&Francis Yuzhen He1, *
[3] Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1653-1670.
[4] Harjoto, M. A., & Laksmana, I. (2018). Corporate governance and CSR performance: Evidence from the Asia- Pacific region. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 541-565.
[5] Zerbib, O. (2019). The green bond market: Financial instruments and environmental impact. Journal of Banking & Finance, 109, 105702.
[6] Flammer, C. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 758-781.
[7] El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
[8] Jiang, F., & Kim, J. B. (2021). ESG ratings and corporate bond yields: Evidence from the US market. Journal of Financial Stability, 52, 100902.
[9] Wang, C., & Chen, G. (2022). ESG rating divergence and corporate debt financing cost: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Research, (07), 123-140.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
