The Correlation Between Business Management Methods and Enterprise Economic Benefits

Authors

  • Jincheng Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/pcc1a025

Keywords:

Dynamic Adaptability, Flat Management, Amoeba Management, Correlation Test

Abstract

In the fierce market competition, enterprises take improving economic benefits as their core goal. There is a close correlation between business management methods and economic benefits, and scientifically appropriate management methods are crucial to the development of enterprises at different stages. This paper aims to study the practical application of business management methods in enterprises, explore the feasibility of these methods, and analyze the gaps in daily research. By integrating literature and theories related to business management methods and conducting comparative case analysis, this paper systematically sorts out the implementation paths of typical business management methods, proposes the research theme of the correlation between business management methods and enterprise economic benefits, and empirically analyzes the specific impact of business management methods on enterprises. The experimental results show that scientifically appropriate business management methods can increase enterprise economic benefits by an average of 15% to 20%. The research conclusions reveal the positive driving mechanism of business management methods on enterprise economic benefits, providing a theoretical basis and practical reference for enterprises to enhance their core competitiveness by optimizing management models.

References

[1] Liao, M. (2017). Paying attention to business management methods to improve corporate economic efficiency. Modern Economic Information, (08), 128.

[2] Liu, F. (2023). Strengthening corporate financial management to improve economic efficiency. China Collective Economy, (25), 107–110.

[3] Rao, L. (2006). A study on management methods for improving the economic efficiency of commercial enterprises (Master’s thesis, Beijing University of Posts and Dean&Francis Jincheng Liu Telecommunications). Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/ kcms2/article/abstract?v=Ss1McYY34CfzmWbsx47TrCcvQhfx l3GDaFJDoykz_AEPB8odDn7ZumcuoRvJCqHb8e61QyL_VQ l8mHYqcgZdaaxhDaP2dJkS7g1Ejop5vQsIbt_0hXd8JWUDH7c guKacOg0zABhwrb0LCLUUeImRD8482tWDlSDn7ucLVOW wc3pqwvnIlf4bnQ==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

[4] Li, G. (2016). Strengthening cost-saving management to improve corporate economic efficiency. Modern Economic Information, (07), 73.

[5] Li, S., & Nan, K. (2024). An analysis of benchmarking management to improve corporate economic efficiency. Modern Business Research, (05), 170–172.

[6] Amiba. (2024). Introducing internal marketization is the best way to reduce costs and increase efficiency. NetEase News. Retrieved from https://www.163.com/dy/article/ IS7BVE8R0518T936.html

[7] Shanghai Stock Exchange. (2024). Chongqing Taiji Industry (Group) Co., Ltd. Annual reports, 2016–2024. Retrieved from https://www.sse.com.cn

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19