Overview and application of Endowment Effect, Anchoring and Hindsight Bias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/0nrgh963Keywords:
endowment effect, anchoring, hindsight bias, economic decision-making, behavioral economicsAbstract
This paper systematically examines three core cognitive biases in behavioral economics: the endowment effect, anchoring effect, and hindsight bias, delving into their respective applications and impacts across diverse economic scenarios. Research indicates that the endowment effect causes individuals to assign higher value to possessions they already own, exerting a significant influence on investors’ stock-holding behaviors and the formulation of environmental policies. The anchoring effect reveals the significant influence of initial information on judgments, manifesting prominently in areas such as real estate pricing, art auctions, and project management—even affecting the estimation behaviors of professional practitioners. Hindsight bias manifests as an overestimation of the predictability of outcomes after they become known, subsequently influencing entrepreneurs’ reflections on failure, judgments of audit responsibility, and investors’ ability to learn from market dynamics. This paper employs a literature review methodology to systematically synthesize existing empirical research. It not only provides a theoretical foundation for understanding irrational factors in economic decision-making but also offers robust empirical support for policymakers, facilitating the development of more effective market mechanisms and behavioral intervention strategies.
References
[1] Bucchianeri, G. and Minson, J. (2013) ‘A homeowner’s dilemma: Anchoring in residential real estate transactions’ Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, pp. 76-92.
[2] Beggs, A. and Graddy, K. (2009) ‘Anchoring Effects: Evidence from Art Auctions’ American Economic Review, 99:3, pp. 1027–1039.
[3] Lorko, M. Servátka, and Zhang, L. (2019) ‘Anchoring in project duration estimation’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 162, pp. 49–65.
[4] Cassar, G. and Craig, J. (2009) ‘An investigation of hindsight bias in nascent venture activity’ Journal of Business Venturing, 24, pp. 149-164.
[5] Anderson, J. and Lowe, J. (1993) ‘Evaluation of auditor decisions: Hindsight bias effects and the expectation gap’ Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, pp. 711-737.
[6] Biais, B. and Weber, M. (2009) ‘Hindsight Bias, Risk Perception, and Investment Performance’ Management Science, 55(6), pp. 1018-1029.
[7] Kahneman, D. Knetsch, J. and Thaler, R. (1990) ‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, no. 6.
[8] List, J. (2003) ‘Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
[9] Anagol, S. Balasubramaniam, V. and Ramadoral, T. (2018) ‘Endowment Effects in the Field: Evidence from India’s IPO Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6130 Lotteries’ Review of Economic Studies, 0, pp. 1–34.
[10] xDietza, S. and Venmans, F. (2019) ‘The endowment effect, discounting and the environment’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, pp. 1–25.
[11] Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ Science, Vol. 185, pp. 1124- 1131.
[12] Hawkins, S. and Hastie, R. (1990) ‘Hindsight: Biased Judgments of Past Events After the Outcomes Are Known’ Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), pp. 311-327.
[13] xChristensen-Szalansk, J. and Willham, C. (1991) ‘The Hindsight Bias: A Meta-analysis’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, pp. 147-168.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
