Restructuring Household Consumption through Fertility Decisions: A Systematic Literature Review from a Behavioral Economics Perspective

Authors

  • Junqi Gao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/yy1twy77

Keywords:

Low fertility, Behavioral economics, Consumption structure, Educational expenditure, PSR model

Abstract

This study investigates how fertility decisions under the context of China’s low fertility rate reshape household consumption structures through the lens of behavioral economics. Combining rational choice theory with behavioral biases such as loss aversion, mental accounting, social norms, and present bias, the research applies the PSR (Pressure–State–Response) model to systematically analyze the mechanisms behind consumption divergence. The “Pressure” stage identifies educational expenditure as a dominant driver of fertility pressure; the “State” stage reveals its role in sustaining low fertility trends; the “Response” stage examines how behavioral biases lead childbearing households to prioritize education-related spending while compressing hedonic consumption, whereas non-childbearing households reallocate resources toward self-oriented and instant gratification expenditures. The result of research not only provides evidence for the theoretical framework linking fertility decisions and household consumption patterns, offering empirical insights for targeted policy interventions, but also offers practical implications for aligning fertility policies with differentiated consumption demands.

References

[1] Shi, Jing. China Public Fertility Concept Survey Report (2023). Governance, 2023, Issue 9: 70–74.

[2] Zhang, Xiaoli. Children’s Education Expenditure. China Youth Study, 2014, Issue 8: 5–12.

[3] Becker, G. S. A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press, 1991.

[4] Zhao, Wanling, Wu, Yong-qiu. Will Relaxing Birth Restrictions Reduce Investment in Children’s Education— Evidence from the “Universal Two-Child” Policy. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2025, Vol. 47, No. 6: 15–28.

[5] The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. The State Council‘s Decision on Optimizing Fertility Policies to Promote Long-Term Balanced Population Development. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2021

[6] The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Opinions on Further Reducing the Homework Burden of Students in the Compulsory Education Stage and the Burden of Off-campus Training. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2021.

[7] Chen, Youhua, Miao, Guo. The Allocation of Educational Resources and Fertility Rate. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2019, (3): 97-103.

[8] Kahneman, D, Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, Vol. 47, No. 2: 263– 291.

[9] Rim, H, Kwon, K. Y, Fong, E, Kim, J. Perceptions of Workplace Gender Discrimination and Fertility Intentions among Married Working Women in Korea: Insights from Asymmetric Fixed Effects Models. Population Research and Policy Review, 2025, 44:39.

[10] Thaler, R. H. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1999, Vol. 12, No. 3: 183–206.

[11] Silva, E. M, Moreira, R. de L., & Bortolon, P. M. Mental Accounting and Decision Making: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2023, 107: 102092.

[12] Parkes, O. Defining a Comprehensive Methodology for Sustainability Assessment of Mega-Event Projects. Doctoral Thesis, University College London, 2015

[13] Cialdini, R. B.; Kallgren, C. A.; Reno, R. R. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1991, Vol. 24: 201–234.

[14] O‘Donoghue, T, Rabin, M. Doing It Now or Later. The American Economic Review, 1999, 89(1): 103–124.

[15] Wei, Yi. Constructing a Chinese Household Education Investment Index System. China Education Finance, 2023, Issue 18: 1–21.

[16] Zipser, D, Hui, D, Shi, J, Chen, C. 2024 China Consumer Report: Cautious Optimism with Untapped Potential. McKinsey & Company, 2024.

[17] China Media Group Institute. Survey on a Better Life: Characteristics and Trends of Chinese Residents’ Consumption (2025). China Media Group Institute, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23