How Do Tax Increase Policies Affect Employees Employed by Firms of Different Sizes?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/nj57fv37Keywords:
Employee, Surtax, Employee benefit, Firm sizeAbstract
This study examines how firm size changes the impact of corporate taxation on employee benefits, using the 2014 surtax policy change in Connecticut policy focus. Through a comparative case analysis of two large and two small firms in Connecticut (treatment group) and Pennsylvania (control group), this study analyzes the changes in average non-wage employee benefits before and after the tax rate changes. Financial data from SEC filings (2011–2017) shows that large firms in Connecticut experienced a significantly larger decline in their average employee benefits (−40%) compared to the control group case in Pennsylvania (−9.7%), which a difference of 30.3%. On the other hand, small firms showed a smaller difference (2.6%) in benefit reductions between the control group and treatment group. Employment levels remained relatively stable across both groups, suggesting that benefit adjustments are the main response to surtax policy. These findings suggest that firm size contributes to the effect of taxation on the employee benefits that employees receive, with larger firms showing a greater change in their employees' responses to tax increases.
References
[1] Congressional Research Service. (2021, November 10). The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA): A retrospective.
[2] Summers, L. H. (1981). Taxation and corporate investment: A q-theory approach. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1981(1), 67-127.
[3] Gruber, J., & Poterba, J. (1994). Tax incentives and the decision to purchase health insurance: Evidence from the selfemployed. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 701- 733.
[4] Harberger, A. C. (1962). The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 215–240.
[5] Mutti, J., & Grubert, H. (1985). The taxation of capital income in an open economy: The importance of residentnonresident tax treatment. Journal of Public Economics, 27(3), 291–309.
[6] Randolph, W. C. (2006). International burdens of the corporate income tax. Congressional Budget Office.
[7] Felix, R. A. (2009). Do state corporate income taxes reduce wages? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review, 94(2), 77-102.
[8] Summers, L. H. (1989). Some simple economics of mandated benefits. The American Economic Review, 79(2), 177–183.
[9] Fuest, C., Peichl, A., & Siegloch, S. (2018). Do higher corporate taxes reduce wages? Micro evidence from Germany. American Economic Review, 108(2), 393–418.
[10] Giroud, X., & Rauh, J. (2019). State taxation and the reallocation of business activity: Evidence from establishmentlevel data. Journal of Political Economy, 127(3), 1262–1316.
[11] Brown, C., & Medoff, J. (1989). The employer size-wage effect. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1027–1059.
[12] Idson, T. L., & Oi, W. Y. (1999). Workers are more productive in large firms. American Economic Review, 89(2), 104–108.
[13] Waruwu, F. Z., & Kartikaningdyah, E. (2019). Company size, profitability, and audit quality on tax avoidance. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Banking, Accounting, Management and Economics (ICOBAME 2020) (pp. 259-263). Atlantis Press.
[14] Kim, C., & Zhang, L. (2016). Corporate political connections and tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 78–114.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
