A Review of the Development, Impact and Trends of China’s Land Grant System over the Past Decade

Authors

  • Jingyi Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/q9dwqf98

Keywords:

Land grant system, real estate industry, economic development, overcapacity

Abstract

China’s real estate economy has advanced rapidly since the 1990s tax-sharing reform, generating substantial local fiscal revenues and offering sustained impetus to numerous derivative industries. However, the collapse of the real estate economy has prompted significant societal reflection, leading to the gradual diminishment of property’s role as an economic driver in China. This paper reviews scholarly research on property marketisation over the past decade, aiming to analyse historical data and examine the systemic impacts of real estate policies: driving urbanisation and infrastructure development, enhancing urban planning management standards, and addressing irregularities in tenant-landlord relationships. It further offers reasoned projections for the sector’s future trajectory, providing practical guidance for optimising property market development. This paper is structured into five sections, comprehensively examining the themes of “institutional evolution,” “marketisation impacts,” “government regulation,” and “development trends.” Key research implications emerge in three dimensions: institutionally, the government must strengthen dynamic adjustments, further refine land transaction and property rights systems, enhance risk early-warning mechanisms, and standardise lending, transfer fees, and financing to balance interests between urban and rural areas, as well as among cities of varying scales. At the market level, efforts should focus on optimising the rational allocation of resources, directing land resources towards high-quality development and affordable housing, eliminating substandard property developers, and safeguarding public welfare. Finally, at the policy level, further progress should be made in advancing real estate tax reform to gradually reduce the burden of property-driven urban economic growth.

References

[1] Cheng Jian. Incentive adjustment and changes in land transfer behaviour: A quasi-natural experiment based on departure audits. China Economic Review, 2024, 87.

[2] Ministry of Natural Resources, State Administration for Market Regulation. New “Contract” text issued between natural resources departments and transferees. Ministry of Natural Resources Portal, 14 July 2025. The website of the Ministry of Natural Resources.

[3] Liu Shouying, Wang Zhifeng. Land systems and China’s development model. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 57(04): 25-40.

[4] Sun, Yukun. Land finance dependence and urban land marketisation in China: The perspective of strategic choice of local governments on land transfer. Land Use Policy, 2020.

[5] Sun Hongliang, Chen Jie, Wu Yanbo, Wu Youmeng. How land utilisation competitions influence urban green economic efficiency: Evidence from the “Heroes by Mu” Reform. Economic Analysis and Policy 2025.

[6] Feng Lei, Zhu Yong. The evolutionary logic and transformation direction of China’s land grant system. Chinese Journal of Land Science, 2021, 35(08): 1-10.

[7] General Office of the CPC Central Committee, General Office of the State Council. Opinions on adjusting and improving the scope of land grant revenue use to prioritise support for rural revitalisation. China Government Network, 2020-10-12. the website of the Central People’s Government of the PRC

[8] Lu Ming, Li Pengfei. Urban scale, housing supply and spatial mismatch: An analysis from the perspective of land supply. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57(01): 132-149.

[9] Jiang Nan. Experiences and implications of land development rights systems in Anglo-American jurisdictions. Specialised Research, 2020(2): 165.

[10] Zhang Wei. Strengthening contract performance principles and emphasising full life-cycle land management. Rule of Law Daily, 18 July 2025. Legal Daily.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28