Comparative Analysis of Portfolio Optimization under Various Constraints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/ym51an70Keywords:
Markowitz model, Index model, portfolio optimization, regularizationAbstract
The pursuit of optimal portfolio construction, whether through maximizing expected returns under a fixed level of risk or minimizing risk for a given expected return, constitutes a fundamental aspect of portfolio management. In this study, we analyzed essential statistical metrics for 22 risky assets including 1 index stock, checked about several assumptions, and applied portfolio optimization methods under different regulation requirements to compare the models between Markowitz Model (MM) and the Index Model (IM). We identified key points on the efficient frontier, the Capital Allocation Line (CAL), and feasible portfolios, and we came to the conclusion that MM model is more favorable compared to IM model in this case. By reviewing the different settings of each problem, a sensitivity analysis was also carried out to analyze the effect of regulation on the weights of our portfolio, risk and return, which is critical in practice for investors. This research not only contributes to the empirical literature on the MM and IM models but also offers practical investment recommendations for portfolio construction.
References
revealed that stricter margin requirements, as mandated by [1] Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Regulation T, can significantly influence portfolio risk and Finance, 7(1), 77-91
return profiles. Specifically, we observed that as leverage [2] Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market constraints are relaxed, investors face higher risks, which equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, can lead to suboptimal outcomes. This underscores the 19(3), 425-442.
importance of regulatory frameworks in maintaining fi- [3] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in nancial stability and protecting investors from excessive the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, risk-taking. Policymakers should consider these findings 33(1), 3-56.
when evaluating the potential impact of changes to margin [4] Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund regulations, as overly lenient rules could exacerbate sys- performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
temic risks in the financial markets. [5] Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2003). Improved estimation of For Fund of Funds (FOF) investors, our analysis high- the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to Dean&Francis Zhiheng Lu portfolio selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(5), 603- management: A practical guide to stock portfolio optimization 621. and asset allocation. Oxford University Press. [6] DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal [9] Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2014). Investments versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. strategy? The Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915-1953. [10] Fabozzi, F. J., Kolm, P. N., Pachamanova, D. A., & Focardi, [7] Black, F., & Litterman, R. (1992). Global portfolio S. M. (2007). Robust portfolio optimization and management. optimization. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(5), 28-43. John Wiley & Sons. [8] Michaud, R. O., & Michaud, R. O. (2008). Efficient asset
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
