Registration-Based IPO Reform and the Validity of Multifactor Models: An Empirical Test Based on Chinese A-Shares
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/j66gdf29Keywords:
Registration-based reform, Institutional dependence, Multifactor models, Asset pricing, Market efficiencyAbstract
The registration-based IPO reform signifies a substantial institutional transformation within China's capital market. This study utilizes a dataset comprising 389,140 observations from Chinese A-share listed companies between 2016 and 2024, employing the launch of the STAR Market in 2019 as a quasi-natural experiment. This study employs a multifaceted methodological approach, encompassing the difference-in-differences (DiD) method, mediation model, and panel error correction model (ECM), to examine the impact of this reform on the validity of the Fama-French five-factor model (FF5). The findings of the study indicate that following the implementation of the reform, there was a substantial increase in the model's R² by 2.1%, as well as a significant rise in the model's |α| ( where |α| denotes the absolute value of the intercept) by 5.97%. The analysis indicates that the mediating effect of disclosure quality accounts for 89.30% of the total effect, while the half-life experienced an extension from 2.42 months to 3.51 months, marking a 45% increase. This study makes a significant contribution to the asset pricing research field by expanding its scope to include institutional dependence. By examining this phenomenon, it becomes possible to understand the trade-off between disclosure quality and pricing efficiency resulting from the reform.
References
[1] Chen J, Ke B, Wu D, Yang Z, 2020. The impact of the STAR market on the pricing efficiency of China’s A-share market. China Journal of Accounting Research 13, 215–232. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.07.001
[2] Douglass C North, 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[3] Fama, E.F., French, K.R., 2015. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics 116, 1–22. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
[4] Healy, P.M., Palepu, K.G., 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165- 4101(01)00018-0 Dean&Francis Wenjia Li
[5] Huang, Jun, Chen, Xinyu, Zhang, Tianshu, 2022. Registration System Reform and IPO Pricing Efficiency: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the STAR Market. Economic Research Journal 57, 147–163.
[6] Jensen, M.C., 1968. THE PERFORMANCE OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN THE PERIOD 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance 23, 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00815. x
[7] Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360. https://doi. org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
[8] Leuz C, Wysocki P D, 2016. Economic consequences of financial reporting and disclosure regulation: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61, 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jacceco.2016.05.003
[9] Lo, A.W., 2004. The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis. The Journal of Portfolio Management 30, 15–29. https://doi. org/10.3905/jpm.2004.442611
[10] Malkiel, B.G., Fama, E.F., 1970. EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK*. The Journal of Finance 25, 383–417. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
[11] Ritter, J.R., 1991. The Long‐Run Performance of initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance 46, 3–27. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x
[12] Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance 52, 737–783. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
