Quantitative Easing and Climate Change: A Case Study

Authors

  • Zeyu Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/fc5k3h26

Keywords:

Green Bond, SDGs Bond, Carbon Trading Market and Carbon Reduction Project

Abstract

In the context of increasing global climate change, this article takes an in-depth look at how central banks can use quantitative easing to help address this issue. Based on three research methods: Green Bond, SDGs Bond, Carbon Trading Market and Carbon Reduction Project, this paper analyzes the pros and cons of specific measures of quantitative easing in dealing with climate change. The study found that the above three types of quantitative easing policies can effectively guide funds to green industries, promote green economy and sustainable development, and thus mitigate the economic impact of climate change. This research not only provides a new perspective for central bank policy making, but also provides investors with new opportunities for green investment. This paper suggests that the central bank should increase its support for green projects when formulating quantitative easing policies, and encourage investors to actively participate in green investment to jointly promote the response to climate change.

References

[1] Fang Qi, Qian Lihua, Political Commissar Lu. Monetary policy and prudential regulation and climate change: a literature review [J]. Journal of financial development, 2020 (1) : 12. DOI: CNKI: SUN: JRFZ. 0.2020-01-002.

[2] Gao F, Climate Bond Market Initiative. World Environment, 2022(2):90-91.

[3] Global Climate Financing Report 2021, Climate Policy Initiative, 2021. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/ publication/global-landscape-of-climate-finance-2021/

[4] Shankleman J. Apple’s Record $1.5 Billion Green Bond Seen Spurring Other Corporate Issuers[J]. International Environment Reporter, 2016, 39(4):267-268.

[5] Apple issues another $2.2 billion green bond aimed at reducing carbon emissions, Tencent Technology, 2019. https:// tech.qq.com/a/20191108/004320.htm

[6] Apple’s Emissions Reduction Mission, United Nations Climate Change,2020. https://unfccc.int/climate-action/ momentum-for-change/climate-neutral-now/apple

[7] SDGs Corporate Action Guide, UN Global Compact. https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/issues_ doc%2Fdevelopment%2FSDGCompass-ZH.pdf

[8] Marcu A, Alberola E, Caneill J Y, et al. 2018 State of the EU ETS Report [J]. ERCST. Retrieved from: https://ercst. org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/20180416-2018-State-of-EU-ETS- Report-Finalall-logos-. pdf, 2018.

[9] Laing T, Sato M, Grubb M, et al. The effects and side‐effects of the EU emissions trading scheme[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2014, 5(4): 509-519.

[10] Alberola E, Chevallier J, Chèze B. The EU ETS: CO2 prices drivers during the learning experience (2005-2007). 2009.

[11] Kuik O, Oosterhuis F. Economic impacts of the EU ETS: preliminary evidence[J]. Faure, M. and M. Peeters, Climate Change and European Emissions Trading, Edward Elgard, Cheltenham/Northampton, 2008: 208-222.

[12] Ellerman A D, Convery F J , De Perthuis Cl .Pricing Carbon: Origins and development of the EU ETS [J]. 2010.

[13] Yu Delong, Wu Ming, Zhao Ling, et al. Carbon capture and sequestration technology research [J]. Journal of modern chemical industry, 2014, 43 (4): 4.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-14