Exploring How IP Co-Branded Products Influence Word-of-Mouth among Generation Z through Social Identity

Authors

  • Ruohui Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/whqww671

Keywords:

IP co-branding, Social identity, Generation Z

Abstract

As Generation Z in China becomes the main consumer force, brands have been launching non-limited but uniquely styled IP collaboration products to attract attention. This article focuses on whether IP co-branded products can stimulate the word-of-mouth communication behavior of Generation Z more than ordinary products and further investigates how social identity functions as an intermediary mechanism in this relationship. Drawing upon social identity theory, a theoretical model is constructed with product type as the independent variable, social identity as the mediating variable, and word-of-mouth communication behavior as the dependent variable. By collecting and analyzing 150 valid questionnaires, reliability analysis, variance analysis, and mediating effect analysis were conducted using SPSS. The results show that IP co-branded products significantly enhance the willingness of word-of-mouth communication; Social identity plays a partial mediating role in the path by which IP co-branded products influence word-of-mouth communication behavior. The research further verified the role path of IP co-branded products in promoting consumers' willingness to communicate by stimulating social psychological mechanisms and provided empirical evidence for brands to formulate marketing strategies based on cultural identity.

References

[1] Esch FR, Langner T, Schmitt BH, & Geus P. Are brands forever? How brand knowledge and relationships affect current and future purchases. Journal of product & brand management, 2006, 15(2): 98-105.

[2] Djafarova E, & Trofimenko O. ‘Instafamous’–credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, communication & society, 2019, 22(10): 1432- 1446.

[3] Kang Y, & Feng Q. Impact of brand and IP co-branding on retention intention: consumer perception perspective. Procedia Computer Science, 2024, 242: 243-248.

[4] Dong X. Review and outlook on brand co-branded IP. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 2023, 48: 31-37.

[5] Park C W, Eisingerich AB, Pol G, & Park JW. The role of brand logos in firm performance. Journal of business research, 2013, 66(2): 180-187.

[6] Prensky M. Digital Natives, digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 2001,. 9(5): 1–6.

[7] Berger J, & Schwartz EM. What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth?. Journal of marketing research, 2011, 48(5): 869-880.

[8] Tajfel H, Turner, JC, Austin WG, & Worchel S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader, 1979, 56(65): 9780203505984-16.

[9] Huang D. Research on the influence of IP co-branding on consumers’ purchase intention- mediated by consumers’ perceived value. In SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 2024. (181, 01026)

[10] Mael F, & Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 1992, 13(2): 103-123.

[11] Chu SC, & Kim Y. Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International journal of Advertising, 2011, 30(1): 47-75.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26