Exploring Consumer Perceptions of the Pink Tax: A Study on Gender, Age, and Income

Authors

  • Jiasheng Fang
  • Sijia Huang
  • Xinzhu Shao
  • Yuting Tang
  • Yurun Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/7gq0v151

Keywords:

pink tax, consumer perception, gender in-equality, gender-based pricing

Abstract

The "pink tax" refers to the phenomenon in which products and services marketed toward women are priced higher than comparable products and service targeted at men. Although the concept was first introduced in the 1930s, it has only recently begun to receive significant attention. Compared to other forms of gender inequality, the pink tax is less visible and has consequently been relatively overlooked in discussions on gender disparities. This study investigates current consumer perceptions and attitudes toward the pink tax in China. A gender and consumption questionnaire was distributed, yielding 139 valid responses. Data analysis reveals that public awareness and recognition of the pink tax remain relatively low. Personal background factors, including gender, age, and income, significantly influence awareness and attitudes of the pink tax. Male respondents demonstrate lower awareness and are more likely to support gender-based pricing mechanisms. Older respondents, while less familiar with the concept of the pink tax, exhibit a higher ability to identify products with a pink tax premium compared to younger individuals. Additionally, respondents with lower incomes tend to have more knowledge of the pink tax and express a stronger desire for regulatory interventions, such as legislation, to address the issue. The findings of this study contribute to raising public awareness of gender-based price discrimination and offer new perspectives for promoting gender equality, ultimately forming a more equitable consumer marketplace.

References

Ayres, I. (1991). Gender and car negotiations. Yale Law Journal, 100(5), 1019-1040. China Women’s Daily. (2020, February 25). “Pink tax”: lifting the soft veil of price sexism. Retrieved from http:// pcpaper.cnwomen.com.cn/content/2020-02/25/067358. html?sh=top[^52^] Kochhar, R. (2023, March 1). The Enduring Grip of the Gender Pay Gap. Pew Research Center. https://www. pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/03/01/the-enduringgrip-of-the-gender-pay-gap/ Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests. (n.d.). Www.gov.cn. https://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2013-10/25/content_2515601. htm

Liu, T. H.. (2020). The ‘pink tax’: lifting the soft veil Dean&Francis ISSN 2959-6130

of price sexism. (2024). China Women’s Daily. Retrieved from http://pcpaper.cnwomen.com.cn/content/2020-02/25/067358.html?sh=top[^60^]

Menin, J. (2015). A Study of Gender Pricing in New York City. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/dca/downloads/pdf/partners/ Study-of-Gender-Pricing-in-NYC.pdf

Munchkin. (2023). Pink tax phenomenon analysis —— L’Oreal facial cleanser pricing storm caused by the female consumer rights thinking. Zhihu. https://zhuanlan.zhihu. com/p/689158499

Price Law of the People’s Republic of China. (2024). Www.gov.cn. https://www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-09/12/content_69757.htm

Sernac. (2019). Price discrimination based on gender in products. Sernac. Retrieved from https://www.sernac.cl/ en/

State of California. (2023). California Civil Code Section 51.14. California Civil Code. Retrieved from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=51.14.

Wang, Yuxiang. (2018). New manifestations of the “generation gap” between contemporary youth and elders. People’s Forum. Retrieved from http://www.rmlt.com. cn/2018/0820/542548.shtml

Zhang Di. (2005). Don’t fall into the “pink” trap. Zhengzhou Daily Digital Newspaper - Zhongyuan.com - the first digital newspaper in the provincial capital. Retrieved from https://zzrb.zynews.cn/html/2024-03/15/content_1428409.htm[^73^]

Downloads

Published

2025-06-17