Analysis on the dilemma of ineffective data flow governance under the WTO framework and its solution: from the perspective of evolutionary interpretation

Authors

  • Ling Dong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/5etezs35

Keywords:

WTO, GATS, data flow, evolutionary inter-pretation

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy has made cross-border data flows an important issue in global trade. As the most important international economic organization in today's era, the data flow governance system under the WTO framework faces many difficulties such as missing rules and lack of consensus. The core cause of the current governance dilemma lies in the improper application and absence of treaty interpretation. On the one hand, the traditional interpretation path cannot cover the unique attributes of data flow, which makes the existing rules lag behind in issues such as data attributes, service models and service classification. On the other hand, the generalized use of public moral exception clauses shows the interpretation defects of existing interpretation methods in concepts such as "public morals". Evolutionary interpretation provides an innovative path to alleviate the above dilemma. By rediscovering the connotation of the text and the purpose of the contract, evolutionary interpretation explores the potential of GATS norms on the basis of the existing WTO framework, and provides important theoretical support for the WTO's in-depth participation in data flows.

References

[1] OECD/WTO (2025), Economic Implications of Data Regulation: Balancing Openness and Trust, OECD Publishing, Paris.

[2] Nivedita Sen, Understanding the Role of the WTO in International Data Flows: Taking the Liberalization or the Regulatory Autonomy Path?, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 21, Issue 2, June 2018, Pages 323–348.

[3] Mirra Burri, The Governance of Data Flows in Trade Agreements:The Pitfalls of Legal Adaptation,51 UC Davis Law Review 78,2017.

[4] Daniel Crosby, Analysis of Data Localization Measures Under WTO Services Trade Rules and Commitments,E15 Initiative, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and WorldEconomic Forum (2016)

[5] Mitchell,A.&J.Hepburn,Don’t Fence Me in:Reforming Trade and Investment Law to Better Facilitate Cross Border Data Transfer,19 Yale Journal of Law and Technology 182(2017).

[6] Nicolas F. Diebold, The Morals and Order Exceptions in WTO Law: Balancing the Toothless Tiger and the Undermining Mole, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 11, Issue 1, March 2008, Pages 43–74, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgm036

[7] Federico Ortino, Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US – Gambling: A Critique, Journal of International Economic Law, Volume 9, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages 117–148, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgi052

[8] Fleuter S .The Role of Digital Products Under the WTO: A New Framework for GATT and GATS Classification[J].Chicago Journal of International Law, 2016, 17.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-17