Governance Challenges in Electric Vehicle Adoption: A Case Study of China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/b6cxde51Keywords:
Electric Vehicles, Renewable Energy, Battery Production, Policy Integration, Environmental Gover-nanceAbstract
The paper discusses the governance challenges of electric vehicle adoption in China, now a global leader in EV promotion, as part of its strategy to cut greenhouse gas emissions and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. Three major governance challenges point out the use of non-renewable energy sources, an insufficient number of charging infrastructures, and environmental impact due to battery production. While EVs can have a positive impact on the reduction of emissions in the transportation sectors, much is left in the balance due to a high proportion of coal-based electricity in China’s energy mix and environmental costs from producing and disposing of batteries. The analysis, therefore, puts forward some remedies for these challenges: better cross-sectoral policy integration between the energy and transport sectors, infrastructure development through public-private partnerships, and international cooperation on regulating battery supply chains. It concludes that EVs require a holistic approach that combines energy policy, infrastructure development, and global supply chain governance for maximum environmental benefit. The big picture of sustainable transport, such findings have offered insights and recommendations for other countries willing to overcome similar governance challenges in their efforts and processes of transitioning towards electric mobility.
References
[1] Zhang Runsen, and Shinichiro Fujimori. The role of transport electrification in global climate change mitigation scenarios. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(3): 034019.
[2] Larminie, James, and John Lowry. Electric Vehicle Technology Explained. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
[3] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China. China’s Action Plan for Carbon Peaking before 2030. 2021. Available from: http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/fl/202105/ t20210519_832406.shtml.
[4] Hawkins, Troy R., Bhawna Singh, Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, and Anders Hammer Strømman. Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2012, 17(1): 53-64.
[5] Saurat, Mathieu, and Stefan Bringezu. Platinum group metal flows of Europe, part 1. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008, 12: 754-767.
[6] Gan, Yu, Michael Wang, Zifeng Lu, and Jarod Kelly. Taking into Account Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electric Vehicles for Transportation Decarbonization. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 1-9.
[7] Röder, Alexander. Integration of lifecycle assessment and energy planning models for the evaluation of car powertrains and fuels. PhD Dissertation, ETH Zurich, 2001.
[8] Wang Lin, Zhang Xian. Environmental and Social Costs of Battery Production for Electric Vehicles. Energy Policy, 2020, Dean&Francis 158: 112245.
[9] Li Jing, Tan Min. Addressing the Challenges of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles in China. Energy Reports, 2019, 5: 822-830.
[10] Shukla, A. K., and T. Prem Kumar. Materials for nextgeneration lithium batteries. Current Science, 2008, 93(3): 314- 331.
[11] Burnham, A., M. Wang, and Ying Wu. Development and applications of GREET 2.7—The transportation vehicle-cycle model. Argonne National Laboratory, University of Chicago, 2006.
[12] MIIT. Measures for Passenger Cars Corporate Average Fuel Consumption and New Energy Vehicle Credit Regulation. Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the Chinese government, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
