Does the Eutrophication Control Improve People’s Utility: Evidence from the Second-Hand Housing Market and the Taihu Lake Sludge Removal Project

Authors

  • Junyi Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/4jbm2j10

Keywords:

Eutrophication, Urban Economics, DID, Policy Analysis, Hedonic Model

Abstract

Addressing water body eutrophication often requires substantial and long-term public expenditure. However, due to the public good (PG) nature of water management policies, there is limited research estimating the level of public support for such policies. In 2020, the Chinese government implemented a closed dredging project around the Taihu Lake basin in Wuxi, creating a potential natural experiment. This paper uses second-hand housing transaction data from Wuxi from 2017 onwards. By employing revealed preference and hedonic pricing models, to construct a difference-in-differences (DID) model, the paper evaluates the causal effect of the dredging policy on second-hand housing prices in the Binhu District, aiming to reflect the impact of the dredging policy on residents. The study finds that the eutrophication dredging policy significantly increased the second-hand housing prices by 8% on average in the affected areas, though the duration of this effect appears to be limited. This research provides valuable insights into the economic effects of environmental governance policies and considerations for future water quality management decisions by governments.

References

[1] UN, “UN World Water Development Report 2024,” [Online]. Available: https://www.unwater.org/publications/un-worldwater-development-report-2024.

[2] S. O. Akinnawo, “Eutrophication: Causes, consequences, physical, chemical and biological techniques for mitigation strategies,” Environmental Challenges, vol. 12, p. 100733, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100733.

[3] Environmental Protection Agency, “Effects: Dead zones and harmful algal blooms,” Dean&Francis

[4] https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/effects-dead-zonesand-harmful-algal-blooms.

[5] WWQA, “Ecosystems and water quality,”

[6] https://www.unep.org/interactives/wwqa/technicalhighlights/ecosystems-and-water-quality.

[7] Y. Zhang, X. Yao, and B. Qin, “A critical review of the development, current hotspots, and future directions of Lake Taihu research from the bibliometrics perspective,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 23, pp. 12811–12821, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6856-1.

[8] X. Yan, Y. Xia, C. Ti, J. Shan, Y. Wu, and X. Yan, “Thirty years of experience in water pollution control in Taihu Lake: A review,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 914, p. 169821, 2024.

[9] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169821.

[10] Xinhua News Agency. (2007). “When Blue Algae Strikes: Wuxi Responds to the Crisis by Activating Emergency Mechanisms.” June 1, 2007. Retrieved August 29, 2024, from https://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2007-06/01/content_632597.htm.

[11] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. (2008). “China Environmental Status Bulletin 2008.” Retrieved from https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/ sthjbgw/qt/200910/t20091031_180761.htm.

[12] Jiangsu Provincial Department of Ecology and Environment. (2024). “Key Period for Ensuring Taihu Lake’s Safe Summer Approaches: Jiangsu Intensifies and Refines Governance Efforts.” April 11, 2024. Accessed August 29, 2024.

[13] https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/14JkqZ5HoggzayQTCKBoTA

[14] Wu, L. F., Zhu, Y., & Zhu, X. (2023). “Analysis of Factors Affecting the Persistent Outbreak of Blue Algae in Taihu Lake from 2007 to 2020.” Water Resources Development and Management, 9(2), 43-49, 84. DOI:10.16616/j.cnki.10-1326/ TV.2023.02.11.

[15] China Daily, “New measures launched to protect Taihu Lake in Wuxi,” Sep. 21, 2020.

[16] https://regional.chinadaily.com.cn/jiangsu/wuxi/2020- 09/21/c_542150.htm.

[17] Teller Report, “Visiting the ecological dredging of Taihu Lake in Wuxi, Jiangsu: Some silt ‘turns waste into treasure’,” Jun. 20, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31