International Economic Cooperation Organization in Globalization and Anti-globalization: Roles and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/nynmna91Keywords:
Economic globalization, Anti-globalization, International economic cooperation organizationAbstract
In the wave of economic globalization, the economies of all countries are closely linked, forming a complex and diversified international economic system. However, the trend of anti-globalization has grown more and more prominent in recent years due to significant changes in the global economic landscape and the ongoing accumulation of internal contradictions. This phenomenon is now unavoidable in the process of global development. In light of this, it is especially important and urgent to consider how international economic cooperation organizations will develop as important pillars of the global economic governance system, what major obstacles they will face, and how they will grow going forward. These organizations need to flexibly adapt to the ever-changing international economic environment to strengthen global economic cooperation and governance and jointly address the challenges posed by anti-globalization. This paper focuses on three representative international economic cooperation organizations, namely the World Trade Organization, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank, and adopts the research method of literature review, aiming to systematically summarize the research results of previous researchers. Through in-depth analysis, this paper seeks to reveal how these organizations have evolved new roles and faced unprecedented challenges in the complex context of globalization and anti-globalization. Lastly, this paper will offer specific policy recommendations for these international economic cooperation organizations based on the research mentioned above in order to help them respond to the current circumstances more effectively and to support the robust growth of the world economy.References
This paper examines the challenges faced by these three Modeling, 2004, 26(4): 439-463. major international economic cooperation organizations in [2] He L, Lin X, Zhang Z. The impact of de-globalization on the face of globalization and anti-globalization. The chal- China’s economic transformation: Evidence from manufacturing
lenges associated with globalization encompass various export. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2020, 42(3): 628-660. issues such as the escalation of economic inequality, the [3] Went R. Economic globalization plus cosmopolitanism?
competing interests of developed and developing nations, Review of International Political Economy, 2010, 11(2): 337- and the flexibility of the global governance framework. 355. The challenges of anti-globalization include the rise of [4] Shamita G, Sushil. Impact of de-globalization on protectionism and unilateralism, the weakening of the development: Comparative analysis of an emerging market multilateral trading system, and the dilemma of global (India) and a developed country (USA). Journal of Policy
economic governance. The challenges of governance and Modeling, 2022, 44(6): 1179-1197. reform within the organization itself include the need for [5] Shamita G, Sushil. Determinants of deglobalization: a reform of the organization’s internal structure and deci- hierarchical model to explore their interrelations as a conduit to
sion-making mechanisms, and the need to balance and policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2021, 43(2): 433-447. coordinate the interests of member countries. [6] Buttel H F. Some observations on the anti‐globalization
Based on these analyses, this paper argues that despite movement. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 2003, 38(1): 95- the recent impact of the New Crown Epidemic on the 116.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
