The Impact of Online Platform Financing on the Long-Term Success and Sustainability of Startups: Case Study of Oculus Rift and Jawbone
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61173/k5pvd829Keywords:
Online Platform Financing, Startups, Crowdfunding, SustainabilityAbstract
With the rapid growth of the entrepreneurial ecosystem, the diversification of financing methods for entrepreneurs has provided new options, especially as online platform financing is emerging as a viable alternative to traditional financing methods. This study aims to explore how online platform financing affects the long-term success and sustainability of startups and to compare it with traditional financing methods. Through in-depth analyses of two case studies, Oculus Rift and Jawbone, it is found that online platform financing not only provides financial support but also leverages the wisdom and resources of the investor community, thus enhancing the market competitiveness and brand loyalty of startups. However, there are also risks associated with online financing, such as the challenges of independence and strategic control that startups may face after success. The study suggests that a balanced approach combining online platform financing and traditional venture capital may offer startups a more promising growth path toward long-term success and sustainability.References
[1] Ziegler T, Shneor R. Lending crowdfunding: principles and market development. Advances in crowdfunding: Research and practice, 2020: 63-92.
[2] Wright F. How do entrepreneurs obtain financing? An evaluation of available options and how they fit into the current entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 2017, 22(3-4): 190-200.
[3] Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S. The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Science, 2015, 61(5): 949-962.
[4] Basha S A, Elgammal M M, Abuzayed B M. Online peer-topeer lending: A review of the literature. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2021, 48: 101069.
[5] Hahn D, Minola T, Vismara S, et al. Financing innovation: Challenges, opportunities, and trends. Foundations and trends® in entrepreneurship, 2019, 15(3-4): 328-367.
[6] Amara M, Ben Cheikh A, Abdellati T. Crowdfunding: Determinants and motivations of the contributors to the crowdfunding platforms. The site is Social Science Research Network, consultable sur http://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm, 2014.
[7] Fatema K, Syeed M M, Miah M S U. Demography of startup software companies: an empirical investigation on the success and failure. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2020, 975: 8887.
[8] Cantamessa M, Gatteschi V, Perboli G, et al. Startups’ roads to failure. Sustainability, 2018, 10(7): 2346.
[9] Tomczak A, Brem A. A conceptualized investment model of crowdfunding. Venture Capital, 2013, 15(4): 335-359.
[10] Gleasure R, Feller J. A rift in the ground: Theorizing the evolution of anchor values in crowdfunding communities through the Oculus Rift case study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2016, 17(10): 1.
[11] Kuratko D F, Holt H L, Neubert E. Blitzscaling: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 2020, 63(1): 109-119.
[12] Adhikary B K, Kutsuna K, Hoda T, et al. Crowdfunding potential in developing countries, case of Bangladesh. Crowdfunding: Lessons from Japan’s Approach, 2018: 77-94.
[13] Babich V, Marinesi S, Tsoukalas G. Does crowdfunding benefit entrepreneurs and venture capital investors. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2021, 23(2): 508-524.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 by the authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
