Impact of National Socio-cultural Context and Geography on the Feasibility of Energy Transition

Authors

  • Xinruo Wang
  • Wenzhe Wang
  • Yiyang Xu
  • Minjae Kim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61173/fadvrk86

Keywords:

Energy transition, economic development, geographic conditions, socio-cultural factors, sustainable development

Abstract

This study aims to explore the feasibility and development paths of global energy transition by analyzing the economic, geographic, social, and political characteristics of various countries in their energy transition processes. The results show significant differences in the progress of energy transition among countries. Developed countries, with their economic strength and technological capabilities, can advance energy transitions more quickly, while developing countries face more obstacles. These insights highlight the importance of tailored strategies based on the unique challenges and resources of each country to promote global energy transition. A review of existing literature reveals that current energy transition research primarily focuses on individual countries. This paper categorizes countries into three groups, summarizes their common characteristics, and analyzes their impact on energy transition, particularly the relationship between economic development, income inequality, education levels, and population size. The study data indicate that countries with higher per capita GDP, lower Gini coefficients, and higher proportions of university-educated labor forces are more successful in energy transition. The paper advocates for a holistic approach that includes socio-economic reforms in addition to technological advancements to promote energy transition.

References

unique challenges and resources to promote global energy [1] Zhang, X., Huang, X., Zhang, D., Geng, Y., Tian, L., Fan, Y., transition. & Chen, W. (2022). Research on the Pathway and Policies for Through reviewing existing literature, we found that China’s Energy and Economy Transformation toward Carbon current energy transition research mainly targets individ- Neutrality. Journal of Management World, (01), 35-66. doi: ual countries. This paper focuses on three categories of 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2022. 0005. countries, summarizing their common characteristics to [2] Xiao, X., & Zheng, Z. (2022). New Power Systems Dominated by Renewable Energy Towards the Goal of Emission

Peak & Carbon Neutrality: Contribution, Key Techniques, for understanding the evolving global energy system. Energy and Challenge. Advanced Engineering Sciences (01), 47-59. Strategy Reviews, 26, 100382. doi:10.15961/j.jsuese.202100656. [12] Bolwig, S., Bolkesjø, T. F., Klitkou, A., Lund, P. D., [3] Zhu, T., & Wang, L. (2015). National Energy Transition: Bergaentzlé, C., Borch, K., ... & Skytte, K. (2020). Climate- German and American Practices and China’s Choices,286, friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The Zhejiang: Zhejiang University Press. integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches [4] Chen, B. (2022). The Energy Transition of the Nordic in the Nordic-Baltic region. Energy Research & Social Science, Countries and Its Enlightenment to China. Master’s thesis, 67, 101559. Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences. [13] Breetz, H., Mildenberger, M., & Stokes, L. (2018). The [5] Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., & Yang, X. (2022). C Characteristics political logics of clean energy transitions. Business and and Influencing Factors of Urban Energy Transition in China; Politics, 20(4), 492-495. Based on Empirical Evidence from 131 Cities in China, Journal [14] Morris, C., & Jungjohann, A. (2016). Energy democracy. of Technology Economics, (04), 130-140. Germanys Energiewende to. [6] Xue, Y., Zhu, H., Wang, Q., & Zhao, H. (2019) Support of the [15] Lund, H. (2014). Renewable energy systems: a smart Internet of things for energy transformation, Chinese Journal on energy systems approach to the choice and modeling of 100% Internet of Things, (01), 1-7. renewable solutions. Academic Press. [7] Ma, L., & Dong, Y. (2020). Innovation Policy Driven [16] Stokes, L. C. (2020). Short circuiting policy: Interest and National Energy Transition: The Case of Denmark. groups and the battle over clean energy and climate policy in the Modernization of Management, (04), 23-28.doi: 10.19634/ American States. USA: Oxford University Press. j.cnkic.2020.04.007. [17] Tongia, R., & Gross, S. (2019). A Vision for a Secure and [8] Nilsson, M. (2005). Learning, frames, and environmental Sustainable Power System for India. Brookings India IMPACT policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy. Series No. 012019. Environment and Planning C: Government and policy, 23(2), [18] Kappner, K., Letmathe, P., & Weidinger, P. (2023). Causes 207-226. and effects of the German energy transition in the context of [9] Czarny, R. M. (2017). A modern Nordic saga: Politics, environmental, societal, political, technological, and economic economy and society (pp. 207-229). Cham: Springer developments. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13(1), 28. International Publishing. [19] Gao, H., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Liu, Y., & Wu, M. (2020). [10] Czarny, R. M. (2020). The Nordic Dimension of Energy World Energy Transition Trends and Transition Practices in Security (pp. 67-99). Springer. Major Countries. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, [11] Singh, H. V., Bocca, R., Gomez, P., Dahlke, S., & Bazilian, (03), 75-87. M. (2019). The energy transitions index: An analytic framework

Downloads

Published

2024-10-29